database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-03 20:02:46 +03:00
Code Activity

Initial pgindent run for v12.

Browse Source 
This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent.
I thought it would be good to commit this separately,
so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2019-05-22 12:55:34 -04:00
parent 66a4bad83a
commit be76af171c
221 changed files with 1433 additions and 1302 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
src/backend/access/spgist/spgscan.c
View File

@ -39,8 +39,8 @@ static int
pairingheap_SpGistSearchItem_cmp(const pairingheap_node *a,
const pairingheap_node *b, void *arg)
{
const SpGistSearchItem *sa = (const SpGistSearchItem *) a;
const SpGistSearchItem *sb = (const SpGistSearchItem *) b;
const SpGistSearchItem *sa = (const SpGistSearchItem *) a;
const SpGistSearchItem *sb = (const SpGistSearchItem *) b;
SpGistScanOpaque so = (SpGistScanOpaque) arg;
int i;
@ -79,7 +79,7 @@ pairingheap_SpGistSearchItem_cmp(const pairingheap_node *a,
}
static void
spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item)
{
if (!so->state.attLeafType.attbyval &&
DatumGetPointer(item->value) != NULL)
@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ spgFreeSearchItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
* Called in queue context
*/
static void
spgAddSearchItemToQueue(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item)
spgAddSearchItemToQueue(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item)
{
pairingheap_add(so->scanQueue, &item->phNode);
}
@ -439,7 +439,7 @@ spgNewHeapItem(SpGistScanOpaque so, int level, ItemPointer heapPtr,
* the scan is not ordered AND the item satisfies the scankeys
*/
static bool
spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistLeafTuple leafTuple, bool isnull,
bool *reportedSome, storeRes_func storeRes)
{
@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ spgLeafTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
static void
spgInitInnerConsistentIn(spgInnerConsistentIn *in,
SpGistScanOpaque so,
SpGistSearchItem * item,
SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistInnerTuple innerTuple)
{
in->scankeys = so->keyData;
@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ spgInitInnerConsistentIn(spgInnerConsistentIn *in,
static SpGistSearchItem *
spgMakeInnerItem(SpGistScanOpaque so,
SpGistSearchItem * parentItem,
SpGistSearchItem *parentItem,
SpGistNodeTuple tuple,
spgInnerConsistentOut *out, int i, bool isnull,
double *distances)
@ -585,7 +585,7 @@ spgMakeInnerItem(SpGistScanOpaque so,
}
static void
spgInnerTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem * item,
spgInnerTest(SpGistScanOpaque so, SpGistSearchItem *item,
SpGistInnerTuple innerTuple, bool isnull)
{
MemoryContext oldCxt = MemoryContextSwitchTo(so->tempCxt);
@ -683,7 +683,7 @@ enum SpGistSpecialOffsetNumbers
static OffsetNumber
spgTestLeafTuple(SpGistScanOpaque so,
SpGistSearchItem * item,
SpGistSearchItem *item,
Page page, OffsetNumber offset,
bool isnull, bool isroot,
bool *reportedSome,

4
src/backend/access/spgist/spgtextproc.c
View File

@ -632,8 +632,8 @@ spg_text_leaf_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
res = (level >= queryLen) ||
DatumGetBool(DirectFunctionCall2Coll(text_starts_with,
PG_GET_COLLATION(),
out->leafValue,
PointerGetDatum(query)));
out->leafValue,
PointerGetDatum(query)));
if (!res) /* no need to consider remaining conditions */
break;

6
src/backend/access/spgist/spgvacuum.c
View File

@ -192,9 +192,9 @@ vacuumLeafPage(spgBulkDeleteState *bds, Relation index, Buffer buffer,
* happened since VACUUM started.
*
* Note: we could make a tighter test by seeing if the xid is
* "running" according to the active snapshot; but snapmgr.c doesn't
* currently export a suitable API, and it's not entirely clear
* that a tighter test is worth the cycles anyway.
* "running" according to the active snapshot; but snapmgr.c
* doesn't currently export a suitable API, and it's not entirely
* clear that a tighter test is worth the cycles anyway.
*/
if (TransactionIdFollowsOrEquals(dt->xid, bds->myXmin))
spgAddPendingTID(bds, &dt->pointer);