database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-22 12:22:45 +03:00
Code Activity

Initial pgindent run for v12.

Browse Source 
This is still using the 2.0 version of pg_bsd_indent.
I thought it would be good to commit this separately,
so as to document the differences between 2.0 and 2.1 behavior.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/16296.1558103386@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2019-05-22 12:55:34 -04:00
parent 66a4bad83a
commit be76af171c
221 changed files with 1433 additions and 1302 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

18
src/backend/access/heap/vacuumlazy.c
View File

@@ -164,7 +164,7 @@ static void lazy_cleanup_index(Relation indrel,
static int lazy_vacuum_page(Relation onerel, BlockNumber blkno, Buffer buffer,
int tupindex, LVRelStats *vacrelstats, Buffer *vmbuffer);
static bool should_attempt_truncation(VacuumParams *params,
LVRelStats *vacrelstats);
LVRelStats *vacrelstats);
static void lazy_truncate_heap(Relation onerel, LVRelStats *vacrelstats);
static BlockNumber count_nondeletable_pages(Relation onerel,
LVRelStats *vacrelstats);
@@ -1067,9 +1067,9 @@ lazy_scan_heap(Relation onerel, VacuumParams *params, LVRelStats *vacrelstats,
* cheaper to get rid of it in the next pruning pass than
* to treat it like an indexed tuple. Finally, if index
* cleanup is disabled, the second heap pass will not
* execute, and the tuple will not get removed, so we
* must treat it like any other dead tuple that we choose
* to keep.
* execute, and the tuple will not get removed, so we must
* treat it like any other dead tuple that we choose to
* keep.
*
* If this were to happen for a tuple that actually needed
* to be deleted, we'd be in trouble, because it'd
@@ -1087,6 +1087,7 @@ lazy_scan_heap(Relation onerel, VacuumParams *params, LVRelStats *vacrelstats,
all_visible = false;
break;
case HEAPTUPLE_LIVE:
/*
* Count it as live. Not only is this natural, but it's
* also what acquire_sample_rows() does.
@@ -1251,13 +1252,14 @@ lazy_scan_heap(Relation onerel, VacuumParams *params, LVRelStats *vacrelstats,
else
{
/*
* Here, we have indexes but index cleanup is disabled. Instead of
* vacuuming the dead tuples on the heap, we just forget them.
* Here, we have indexes but index cleanup is disabled.
* Instead of vacuuming the dead tuples on the heap, we just
* forget them.
*
* Note that vacrelstats->dead_tuples could have tuples which
* became dead after HOT-pruning but are not marked dead yet.
* We do not process them because it's a very rare condition, and
* the next vacuum will process them anyway.
* We do not process them because it's a very rare condition,
* and the next vacuum will process them anyway.
*/
Assert(params->index_cleanup == VACOPT_TERNARY_DISABLED);
}