From b9b7fe8ca452e95f0723e59c1b4b74723e07bc33 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 19:02:21 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix backwards test in operator_precedence_warning logic. Warnings about unary minus might have been wrong. It's a bit surprising that nobody noticed yet ... probably the precedence-warning feature hasn't really been used much in the field. Rikard Falkeborn Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CADRDgG6fzA8A2oeygUw4=o7ywo4kvz26NxCSgpq22nMD73Bx4Q@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c index adbe2350a4e..b8aba007699 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c +++ b/src/backend/parser/parse_expr.c @@ -2936,7 +2936,7 @@ operator_precedence_group(Node *node, const char **nodename) *nodename = strVal(linitial(aexpr->name)); /* Ignore if op was always higher priority than IS-tests */ if (strcmp(*nodename, "+") == 0 || - strcmp(*nodename, "-")) + strcmp(*nodename, "-") == 0) group = 0; else group = PREC_GROUP_PREFIX_OP;