database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-21 00:42:43 +03:00
Code Activity

pgindent run on all C files. Java run to follow. initdb/regression

Browse Source 
tests pass.
This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2001-10-25 05:50:21 +00:00
parent 59da2105d8
commit b81844b173
818 changed files with 21684 additions and 20491 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

22
src/backend/optimizer/path/clausesel.c
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/clausesel.c,v 1.46 2001/06/25 21:11:43 tgl Exp $
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/clausesel.c,v 1.47 2001/10/25 05:49:32 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ typedef struct RangeQueryClause
} RangeQueryClause;
static void addRangeClause(RangeQueryClause **rqlist, Node *clause,
bool varonleft, bool isLTsel, Selectivity s2);
bool varonleft, bool isLTsel, Selectivity s2);
/****************************************************************************
@@ -212,7 +212,6 @@ clauselist_selectivity(Query *root,
{
if (s2 < -0.01)
{
/*
* No data available --- use a default estimate that
* is small, but not real small.
@@ -221,7 +220,6 @@ clauselist_selectivity(Query *root,
}
else
{
/*
* It's just roundoff error; use a small positive
* value
@@ -275,7 +273,6 @@ addRangeClause(RangeQueryClause **rqlist, Node *clause,
for (rqelem = *rqlist; rqelem; rqelem = rqelem->next)
{
/*
* We use full equal() here because the "var" might be a function
* of one or more attributes of the same relation...
@@ -386,7 +383,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
if (rte->subquery)
{
/*
* XXX not smart about subquery references... any way to
* do better?
@@ -395,7 +391,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
}
else
{
/*
* A Var at the top of a clause must be a bool Var. This
* is equivalent to the clause reln.attribute = 't', so we
@@ -405,7 +400,7 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
BooleanEqualOperator,
makeList2(var,
MAKEBOOLCONST(true,
false)),
false)),
varRelid);
}
}
@@ -436,7 +431,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
}
else if (or_clause(clause))
{
/*
* Selectivities for an 'or' clause are computed as s1+s2 - s1*s2
* to account for the probable overlap of selected tuple sets. XXX
@@ -461,7 +455,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
if (varRelid != 0)
{
/*
* If we are considering a nestloop join then all clauses are
* restriction clauses, since we are only interested in the
@@ -471,7 +464,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
}
else
{
/*
* Otherwise, it's a join if there's more than one relation
* used.
@@ -482,19 +474,18 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
if (is_join_clause)
{
/* Estimate selectivity for a join clause. */
s1 = join_selectivity(root, opno,
s1 = join_selectivity(root, opno,
((Expr *) clause)->args);
}
else
{
/* Estimate selectivity for a restriction clause. */
s1 = restriction_selectivity(root, opno,
((Expr *) clause)->args, varRelid);
s1 = restriction_selectivity(root, opno,
((Expr *) clause)->args, varRelid);
}
}
else if (is_funcclause(clause))
{
/*
* This is not an operator, so we guess at the selectivity. THIS
* IS A HACK TO GET V4 OUT THE DOOR. FUNCS SHOULD BE ABLE TO HAVE
@@ -504,7 +495,6 @@ clause_selectivity(Query *root,
}
else if (is_subplan(clause))
{
/*
* Just for the moment! FIX ME! - vadim 02/04/98
*/