1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-27 12:41:57 +03:00

Refine the definition of page-level freezing.

Improve comments added by commit 1de58df4 which describe the
lazy_scan_prune "freeze the page" path.  These newly revised comments
are based on suggestions from Jeff Davis.

In passing, remove nearby visibility_cutoff_xid comments left over from
commit 6daeeb1f.

Author: Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>
Reviewed-By: Jeff Davis <pgsql@j-davis.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/ebc857107fe3edd422ef8a65191ca4a8da568b9b.camel@j-davis.com
This commit is contained in:
Peter Geoghegan
2023-01-03 10:08:55 -08:00
parent bf03cfd162
commit b37a083239
2 changed files with 15 additions and 28 deletions

View File

@ -1788,13 +1788,13 @@ retry:
if (tuples_frozen == 0)
{
/*
* We're freezing all eligible tuples on the page, but have no
* freeze plans to execute. This is structured as a case where
* the page is nominally frozen so that we set pages all-frozen
* whenever no freeze plans need to be executed to make it safe.
* If this was handled via "no freeze" processing instead then
* VACUUM would senselessly waste certain opportunities to set
* pages all-frozen (not just all-visible) at no added cost.
* We have no freeze plans to execute, so there's no added cost
* from following the freeze path. That's why it was chosen.
* This is important in the case where the page only contains
* totally frozen tuples at this point (perhaps only following
* pruning). Such pages can be marked all-frozen in the VM by our
* caller, even though none of its tuples were newly frozen here
* (note that the "no freeze" path never sets pages all-frozen).
*
* We never increment the frozen_pages instrumentation counter
* here, since it only counts pages with newly frozen tuples
@ -1859,12 +1859,6 @@ retry:
if (!heap_page_is_all_visible(vacrel, buf, &cutoff, &all_frozen))
Assert(false);
/*
* It's possible that we froze tuples and made the page's XID cutoff
* (for recovery conflict purposes) FrozenTransactionId. This is okay
* because visibility_cutoff_xid will be logged by our caller in a
* moment.
*/
Assert(!TransactionIdIsValid(cutoff) ||
cutoff == prunestate->visibility_cutoff_xid);
}