mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-15 19:21:59 +03:00
New cost model for planning, incorporating a penalty for random page
accesses versus sequential accesses, a (very crude) estimate of the effects of caching on random page accesses, and cost to evaluate WHERE- clause expressions. Export critical parameters for this model as SET variables. Also, create SET variables for the planner's enable flags (enable_seqscan, enable_indexscan, etc) so that these can be controlled more conveniently than via PGOPTIONS. Planner now estimates both startup cost (cost before retrieving first tuple) and total cost of each path, so it can optimize queries with LIMIT on a reasonable basis by interpolating between these costs. Same facility is a win for EXISTS(...) subqueries and some other cases. Redesign pathkey representation to achieve a major speedup in planning (I saw as much as 5X on a 10-way join); also minor changes in planner to reduce memory consumption by recycling discarded Path nodes and not constructing unnecessary lists. Minor cleanups to display more-plausible costs in some cases in EXPLAIN output. Initdb forced by change in interface to index cost estimation functions.
This commit is contained in:
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c,v 1.44 2000/02/15 03:37:26 thomas Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c,v 1.45 2000/02/15 20:49:19 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -122,28 +122,35 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
/* Is this a simple one */
|
||||
if (!union_all_found ||
|
||||
!union_found ||
|
||||
/* A trailing UNION negates the affect of earlier UNION ALLs */
|
||||
/* A trailing UNION negates the effect of earlier UNION ALLs */
|
||||
!last_union_all_flag)
|
||||
{
|
||||
List *hold_unionClause = parse->unionClause;
|
||||
double tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default processing */
|
||||
|
||||
/* we will do this later, so don't do it now */
|
||||
/* we will do sorting later, so don't do it now */
|
||||
if (!union_all_found ||
|
||||
!last_union_all_flag)
|
||||
{
|
||||
parse->sortClause = NIL;
|
||||
parse->distinctClause = NIL;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* force lower-level planning to assume that all tuples will
|
||||
* be retrieved, even if it sees a LIMIT in the query node.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
tuple_fraction = 0.0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
parse->unionClause = NIL; /* prevent recursion */
|
||||
union_plans = lcons(union_planner(parse), NIL);
|
||||
union_plans = lcons(union_planner(parse, tuple_fraction), NIL);
|
||||
union_rts = lcons(parse->rtable, NIL);
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(ulist, hold_unionClause)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Query *union_query = lfirst(ulist);
|
||||
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans, union_planner(union_query));
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans,
|
||||
union_planner(union_query, tuple_fraction));
|
||||
union_rts = lappend(union_rts, union_query->rtable);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -165,9 +172,12 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Recursion, but UNION only. The last one is a UNION, so it will
|
||||
* not come here in recursion,
|
||||
* not come here in recursion.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX is it OK to pass default -1 to union_planner in this path,
|
||||
* or should we force a tuple_fraction value?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
union_plans = lcons(union_planner(parse), NIL);
|
||||
union_plans = lcons(union_planner(parse, -1.0), NIL);
|
||||
union_rts = lcons(parse->rtable, NIL);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Append the remaining UNION ALLs */
|
||||
@ -175,7 +185,8 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Query *union_all_query = lfirst(ulist);
|
||||
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans, union_planner(union_all_query));
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans,
|
||||
union_planner(union_all_query, -1.0));
|
||||
union_rts = lappend(union_rts, union_all_query->rtable);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -295,6 +306,7 @@ plan_inherit_query(Relids relids,
|
||||
List *union_plans = NIL;
|
||||
List *union_rtentries = NIL;
|
||||
List *save_tlist = root->targetList;
|
||||
double tuple_fraction;
|
||||
List *i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -303,6 +315,17 @@ plan_inherit_query(Relids relids,
|
||||
*/
|
||||
root->targetList = NIL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are going to need sorting or grouping at the top level,
|
||||
* force lower-level planners to assume that all tuples will be
|
||||
* retrieved.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (root->distinctClause || root->sortClause ||
|
||||
root->groupClause || root->hasAggs)
|
||||
tuple_fraction = 0.0; /* will need all tuples from each subplan */
|
||||
else
|
||||
tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default behavior is OK (I think) */
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(i, relids)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int relid = lfirsti(i);
|
||||
@ -344,7 +367,8 @@ plan_inherit_query(Relids relids,
|
||||
relid,
|
||||
new_root);
|
||||
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans, union_planner(new_root));
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans,
|
||||
union_planner(new_root, tuple_fraction));
|
||||
union_rtentries = lappend(union_rtentries, new_rt_entry);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@ -551,14 +575,17 @@ make_append(List *appendplans,
|
||||
node->unionrtables = unionrtables;
|
||||
node->inheritrelid = rt_index;
|
||||
node->inheritrtable = inheritrtable;
|
||||
node->plan.cost = 0;
|
||||
node->plan.startup_cost = 0;
|
||||
node->plan.total_cost = 0;
|
||||
node->plan.plan_rows = 0;
|
||||
node->plan.plan_width = 0;
|
||||
foreach(subnode, appendplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *subplan = (Plan *) lfirst(subnode);
|
||||
|
||||
node->plan.cost += subplan->cost;
|
||||
if (subnode == appendplans) /* first node? */
|
||||
node->plan.startup_cost = subplan->startup_cost;
|
||||
node->plan.total_cost += subplan->total_cost;
|
||||
node->plan.plan_rows += subplan->plan_rows;
|
||||
if (node->plan.plan_width < subplan->plan_width)
|
||||
node->plan.plan_width = subplan->plan_width;
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user