1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2026-01-05 23:38:41 +03:00

Teach bitmap path generation about transforming OR-clauses to SAOP's

When optimizer generates bitmap paths, it considers breaking OR-clause
arguments one-by-one.  But now, a group of similar OR-clauses can be
transformed into SAOP during index matching.  So, bitmap paths should
keep up.

This commit teaches bitmap paths generation machinery to group similar
OR-clauses into dedicated RestrictInfos.  Those RestrictInfos are considered
both to match index as a whole (as SAOP), or to match as a set of individual
OR-clause argument one-by-one (the old way).

Therefore, bitmap path generation will takes advantage of OR-clauses to SAOP's
transformation.  The old way of handling them is also considered.  So, there
shouldn't be planning regression.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdu5iQOjF93vGbjidsQkhHvY2NSm29duENYH_cbhC6x%2BMg%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov, Andrey Lepikhov
Reviewed-by: Alena Rybakina, Andrei Lepikhov, Jian he, Robert Haas
Reviewed-by: Peter Geoghegan
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Korotkov
2024-11-24 01:41:45 +02:00
parent d4378c0005
commit ae4569161a
7 changed files with 664 additions and 104 deletions

View File

@@ -738,6 +738,23 @@ SELECT * FROM tenk1
SELECT * FROM tenk1
WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = (SELECT 1 + 2) OR tenthous = 42);
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM tenk1
WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1 OR tenthous = 3 OR tenthous = 42 OR tenthous IS NULL);
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM tenk1
WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1::int2 OR tenthous::int2 = 3::int8 OR tenthous = 42::int8);
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM tenk1
WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1::int2 OR tenthous::int2 = 3::int8 OR tenthous::int2 = 42::int8);
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM tenk1
WHERE thousand = 42 AND (tenthous = 1::int2 OR tenthous = 3::int8 OR tenthous = 42::int8);
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT count(*) FROM tenk1
WHERE hundred = 42 AND (thousand = 42 OR thousand = 99);
@@ -1321,6 +1338,27 @@ SELECT b.relname,
ORDER BY 1;
DROP TABLE concur_temp_tab_1, concur_temp_tab_2, reindex_temp_before;
-- Check bitmap scan can consider similar OR arguments separately without
-- grouping them into SAOP.
CREATE TABLE bitmap_split_or (a int NOT NULL, b int NOT NULL, c int NOT NULL);
INSERT INTO bitmap_split_or (SELECT 1, 1, i FROM generate_series(1, 1000) i);
INSERT INTO bitmap_split_or (select i, 2, 2 FROM generate_series(1, 1000) i);
VACUUM ANALYZE bitmap_split_or;
CREATE INDEX t_b_partial_1_idx ON bitmap_split_or (b) WHERE a = 1;
CREATE INDEX t_b_partial_2_idx ON bitmap_split_or (b) WHERE a = 2;
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM bitmap_split_or WHERE (a = 1 OR a = 2) AND b = 2;
DROP INDEX t_b_partial_1_idx;
DROP INDEX t_b_partial_2_idx;
CREATE INDEX t_a_b_idx ON bitmap_split_or (a, b);
CREATE INDEX t_b_c_idx ON bitmap_split_or (b, c);
CREATE STATISTICS t_a_b_stat (mcv) ON a, b FROM bitmap_split_or;
CREATE STATISTICS t_b_c_stat (mcv) ON b, c FROM bitmap_split_or;
ANALYZE bitmap_split_or;
EXPLAIN (COSTS OFF)
SELECT * FROM bitmap_split_or WHERE a = 1 AND (b = 1 OR b = 2) AND c = 2;
DROP TABLE bitmap_split_or;
--
-- REINDEX SCHEMA
--