mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-08-25 20:23:07 +03:00
Convert many uses of ReadBuffer[Extended](P_NEW) to ExtendBufferedRel()
A few places are not converted. Some because they are tackled in later commits (e.g. hio.c, xlogutils.c), some because they are more complicated (e.g. brin_pageops.c). Having a few users of ReadBuffer(P_NEW) is good anyway, to ensure the backward compat path stays working. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20221029025420.eplyow6k7tgu6he3@awork3.anarazel.de
This commit is contained in:
@@ -882,7 +882,6 @@ _bt_getbuf(Relation rel, Relation heaprel, BlockNumber blkno, int access)
|
||||
}
|
||||
else
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool needLock;
|
||||
Page page;
|
||||
|
||||
Assert(access == BT_WRITE);
|
||||
@@ -963,31 +962,16 @@ _bt_getbuf(Relation rel, Relation heaprel, BlockNumber blkno, int access)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Extend the relation by one page.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We have to use a lock to ensure no one else is extending the rel at
|
||||
* the same time, else we will both try to initialize the same new
|
||||
* page. We can skip locking for new or temp relations, however,
|
||||
* since no one else could be accessing them.
|
||||
* Extend the relation by one page. Need to use RBM_ZERO_AND_LOCK or
|
||||
* we risk a race condition against btvacuumscan --- see comments
|
||||
* therein. This forces us to repeat the valgrind request that
|
||||
* _bt_lockbuf() otherwise would make, as we can't use _bt_lockbuf()
|
||||
* without introducing a race.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
needLock = !RELATION_IS_LOCAL(rel);
|
||||
|
||||
if (needLock)
|
||||
LockRelationForExtension(rel, ExclusiveLock);
|
||||
|
||||
buf = ReadBuffer(rel, P_NEW);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Acquire buffer lock on new page */
|
||||
_bt_lockbuf(rel, buf, BT_WRITE);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Release the file-extension lock; it's now OK for someone else to
|
||||
* extend the relation some more. Note that we cannot release this
|
||||
* lock before we have buffer lock on the new page, or we risk a race
|
||||
* condition against btvacuumscan --- see comments therein.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (needLock)
|
||||
UnlockRelationForExtension(rel, ExclusiveLock);
|
||||
buf = ExtendBufferedRel(EB_REL(rel), MAIN_FORKNUM, NULL,
|
||||
EB_LOCK_FIRST);
|
||||
if (!RelationUsesLocalBuffers(rel))
|
||||
VALGRIND_MAKE_MEM_DEFINED(BufferGetPage(buf), BLCKSZ);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Initialize the new page before returning it */
|
||||
page = BufferGetPage(buf);
|
||||
|
@@ -970,6 +970,9 @@ btvacuumscan(IndexVacuumInfo *info, IndexBulkDeleteResult *stats,
|
||||
* write-lock on the left page before it adds a right page, so we must
|
||||
* already have processed any tuples due to be moved into such a page.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX: Now that new pages are locked with RBM_ZERO_AND_LOCK, I don't
|
||||
* think the use of the extension lock is still required.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We can skip locking for new or temp relations, however, since no one
|
||||
* else could be accessing them.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user