mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-03 20:02:46 +03:00
Add support for cross-type hashing in hashed subplans (hashed IN/NOT IN cases
that aren't turned into true joins). Since this is the last missing bit of infrastructure, go ahead and fill out the hash integer_ops and float_ops opfamilies with cross-type operators. The operator family project is now DONE ... er, except for documentation ...
This commit is contained in:
@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c,v 1.137 2007/01/20 20:45:39 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/util/pathnode.c,v 1.138 2007/02/06 02:59:12 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -1070,7 +1070,7 @@ distinct_col_search(int colno, List *colnos, List *opids)
|
||||
* We assume hashed aggregation will work if each IN operator is marked
|
||||
* hashjoinable. If the IN operators are cross-type, this could conceivably
|
||||
* fail: the aggregation will need a hashable equality operator for the RHS
|
||||
* datatype --- but it's pretty hard to conceive of a hash opclass that has
|
||||
* datatype --- but it's pretty hard to conceive of a hash opfamily that has
|
||||
* cross-type hashing without support for hashing the individual types, so
|
||||
* we don't expend cycles here to support the case. We could check
|
||||
* get_compatible_hash_operator() instead of just op_hashjoinable(), but the
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user