mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-28 23:42:10 +03:00
Get rid of trailing semicolons in C macro definitions.
Writing a trailing semicolon in a macro is almost never the right thing, because you almost always want to write a semicolon after each macro call instead. (Even if there was some reason to prefer not to, pgindent would probably make a hash of code formatted that way; so within PG the rule should basically be "don't do it".) Thus, if we have a semi inside the macro, the compiler sees "something;;". Much of the time the extra empty statement is harmless, but it could lead to mysterious syntax errors at call sites. In perhaps an overabundance of neatnik-ism, let's run around and get rid of the excess semicolons whereever possible. The only thing worse than a mysterious syntax error is a mysterious syntax error that only happens in the back branches; therefore, backpatch these changes where relevant, which is most of them because most of these mistakes are old. (The lack of reported problems shows that this is largely a hypothetical issue, but still, it could bite us in some future patch.) John Naylor and Tom Lane Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CACPNZCs0qWTqJ2QUSGJ07B7uvAvzMb-KbG2q+oo+J3tsWN5cqw@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
@ -469,7 +469,7 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
tmp3 ^= tmp2; \
|
||||
(R) ^= data.ctx.P[(N) + 1]; \
|
||||
tmp3 += tmp1; \
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3;
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3
|
||||
#else
|
||||
/* Architectures with no complicated addressing modes supported */
|
||||
#define BF_INDEX(S, i) \
|
||||
@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
tmp3 ^= tmp2; \
|
||||
(R) ^= data.ctx.P[(N) + 1]; \
|
||||
tmp3 += tmp1; \
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3;
|
||||
(R) ^= tmp3
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@ -516,17 +516,18 @@ BF_swap(BF_word *x, int count)
|
||||
BF_ROUND(R, L, 15); \
|
||||
tmp4 = R; \
|
||||
R = L; \
|
||||
L = tmp4 ^ data.ctx.P[BF_N + 1];
|
||||
L = tmp4 ^ data.ctx.P[BF_N + 1]
|
||||
|
||||
#if BF_ASM
|
||||
|
||||
extern void _BF_body_r(BF_ctx *ctx);
|
||||
|
||||
#define BF_body() \
|
||||
_BF_body_r(&data.ctx);
|
||||
_BF_body_r(&data.ctx)
|
||||
#else
|
||||
|
||||
#define BF_body() \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
L = R = 0; \
|
||||
ptr = data.ctx.P; \
|
||||
do { \
|
||||
@ -542,7 +543,8 @@ extern void _BF_body_r(BF_ctx *ctx);
|
||||
BF_ENCRYPT; \
|
||||
*(ptr - 2) = L; \
|
||||
*(ptr - 1) = R; \
|
||||
} while (ptr < &data.ctx.S[3][0xFF]);
|
||||
} while (ptr < &data.ctx.S[3][0xFF]); \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static void
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user