database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-12-16 16:42:29 +03:00
Code Activity

Clean up to ensure tag completion as required by the newest versions

Browse Source 
of Norm's Modular Style Sheets and jade/docbook.
From Vince Vielhaber <vev@michvhf.com>.
This commit is contained in:
Thomas G. Lockhart
1998-12-29 02:24:47 +00:00
parent 6d7735e7f0
commit a75f2d21a8
115 changed files with 10587 additions and 8000 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

409
doc/src/sgml/ref/notify.sgml
View File

@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ NOTIFY
<REFPURPOSE>
Signals all frontends and backends listening on a notify condition
</REFPURPOSE>
</refnamediv>
<REFSYNOPSISDIV>
<REFSYNOPSISDIVINFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
@@ -23,208 +23,215 @@ Signals all frontends and backends listening on a notify condition
NOTIFY <REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
</SYNOPSIS>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-1">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Inputs
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-1">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Inputs
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<VARIABLELIST>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Notify condition to be signaled.
<VARIABLELIST>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Notify condition to be signaled.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
</VARIABLELIST>
</para>
</REFSECT2>
</VARIABLELIST>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-2">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Outputs
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<VARIABLELIST>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
NOTIFY
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Acknowledgement that notify command has executed.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
Notify events
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Events are delivered to listening frontends; whether and how each frontend
application reacts depends on its programming.
</PARA>
</LISTITEM>
</VARLISTENTRY>
</VARIABLELIST>
</para>
</REFSECT2>
</REFSYNOPSISDIV>
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-1">
<REFSECT1INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT1INFO>
<TITLE>
Description
</TITLE>
<PARA>
The <command>NOTIFY</command> command sends a notify event to each
frontend application that has previously executed
<command>LISTEN <replaceable class="parameter">notifyname</replaceable></command>
for the specified notify condition in the current database.
</para>
<para>
The information passed to the frontend for a notify event includes the notify
condition name and the notifying backend process's PID. It is up to the
database designer to define the condition names that will be used in a given
database and what each one means.
</para>
<para>
Commonly, the notify condition name is the same as the name of some table in
the database, and the notify event essentially means "I changed this table,
take a look at it to see what's new". But no such association is enforced by
the <command>NOTIFY</command> and <command>LISTEN</command> commands. For
example, a database designer could use several different condition names
to signal different sorts of changes to a single table.
</para>
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> provides a simple form of signal or
IPC (interprocess communication) mechanism for a collection of processes
accessing the same <productname>Postgres</productname> database.
Higher-level mechanisms can be built by using tables in the database to
pass additional data (beyond a mere condition name) from notifier to
listener(s).
</para>
<para>
When <command>NOTIFY</command> is used to signal the occurrence of changes
to a particular table, a useful programming technique is to put the
<command>NOTIFY</command> in a rule that is triggered by table updates.
In this way, notification happens automatically when the table is changed,
and the application programmer can't accidentally forget to do it.
</para>
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> interacts with SQL transactions in some important
ways. Firstly, if a <command>NOTIFY</command> is executed inside a
transaction, the notify events are not delivered until and unless the
transaction is committed. This is appropriate, since if the transaction
is aborted we would like all the commands within it to have had no effect
--- including <command>NOTIFY</command>. But it can be disconcerting if one
is expecting the notify events to be delivered immediately. Secondly, if
a listening backend receives a notify signal while it is within a transaction,
the notify event will not be delivered to its connected frontend until just
after the transaction is completed (either committed or aborted). Again, the
reasoning is that if a notify were delivered within a transaction that was
later aborted, one would want the notification to be undone somehow --- but
the backend cannot "take back" a notify once it has sent it to the frontend.
So notify events are only delivered between transactions. The upshot of this
is that applications using <command>NOTIFY</command> for real-time signaling
should try to keep their transactions short.
</para>
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> behaves like Unix signals in one important
respect: if the same condition name is signaled multiple times in quick
succession, recipients may get only one notify event for several executions
of <command>NOTIFY</command>. So it is a bad idea to depend on the number
of notifies received. Instead, use <command>NOTIFY</command> to wake up
applications that need to pay attention to something, and use a database
object (such as a sequence) to keep track of what happened or how many times
it happened.
</para>
<para>
It is common for a frontend that sends <command>NOTIFY</command> to be
listening on the same notify name itself. In that case it will get back a
notify event, just like all the other listening frontends. Depending on the
application logic, this could result in useless work --- for example,
re-reading a database table to find the same updates that that frontend just
wrote out. In <productname>Postgres</productname> 6.4 and later, it is
possible to avoid such extra work by noticing whether the notifying backend
process's PID (supplied in the notify event message) is the same as one's own
backend's PID (available from libpq). When they are the same, the notify
event is one's own work bouncing back, and can be ignored. (Despite what was
said in the preceding paragraph, this is a safe technique.
<productname>Postgres</productname> keeps self-notifies separate from notifies
arriving from other backends, so you cannot miss an outside notify by ignoring
your own notifies.)
</para>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-3">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Notes
</TITLE>
<para>
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
can be any string valid as a name;
it need not correspond to the name of any actual table. If
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
is enclosed in double-quotes, it need not even be a syntactically
valid name, but can be any string up to 31 characters long.
</para>
<para>
In some previous releases of
<productname>Postgres</productname>,
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
had to be enclosed in double-quotes when it did not correspond to any existing
table name, even if syntactically valid as a name. That is no longer required.
</para>
<para>
In <productname>Postgres</productname> releases prior to 6.4, the backend
PID delivered in a notify message was always the PID of the frontend's own
backend. So it was not possible to distinguish one's own notifies from other
clients' notifies in those earlier releases.
</para>
</REFSECT2>
</refsect1>
</REFSECT2>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-2">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Outputs
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<VARIABLELIST>
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
NOTIFY
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Acknowledgement that notify command has executed.
<VARLISTENTRY>
<TERM>
Notify events
</TERM>
<LISTITEM>
<PARA>
Events are delivered to listening frontends; whether and how each frontend
application reacts depends on its programming.
</PARA>
</LISTITEM>
</VARLISTENTRY>
</VARIABLELIST>
</REFSECT2>
</REFSYNOPSISDIV>
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-1">
<REFSECT1INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT1INFO>
<TITLE>
Description
</TITLE>
<PARA>
The <command>NOTIFY</command> command sends a notify event to each
frontend application that has previously executed
<command>LISTEN <replaceable class="parameter">notifyname</replaceable></command>
for the specified notify condition in the current database.
<para>
The information passed to the frontend for a notify event includes the notify
condition name and the notifying backend process's PID. It is up to the
database designer to define the condition names that will be used in a given
database and what each one means.
<para>
Commonly, the notify condition name is the same as the name of some table in
the database, and the notify event essentially means "I changed this table,
take a look at it to see what's new". But no such association is enforced by
the <command>NOTIFY</command> and <command>LISTEN</command> commands. For
example, a database designer could use several different condition names
to signal different sorts of changes to a single table.
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> provides a simple form of signal or
IPC (interprocess communication) mechanism for a collection of processes
accessing the same <productname>Postgres</productname> database.
Higher-level mechanisms can be built by using tables in the database to
pass additional data (beyond a mere condition name) from notifier to
listener(s).
<para>
When <command>NOTIFY</command> is used to signal the occurrence of changes
to a particular table, a useful programming technique is to put the
<command>NOTIFY</command> in a rule that is triggered by table updates.
In this way, notification happens automatically when the table is changed,
and the application programmer can't accidentally forget to do it.
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> interacts with SQL transactions in some important
ways. Firstly, if a <command>NOTIFY</command> is executed inside a
transaction, the notify events are not delivered until and unless the
transaction is committed. This is appropriate, since if the transaction
is aborted we would like all the commands within it to have had no effect
--- including <command>NOTIFY</command>. But it can be disconcerting if one
is expecting the notify events to be delivered immediately. Secondly, if
a listening backend receives a notify signal while it is within a transaction,
the notify event will not be delivered to its connected frontend until just
after the transaction is completed (either committed or aborted). Again, the
reasoning is that if a notify were delivered within a transaction that was
later aborted, one would want the notification to be undone somehow --- but
the backend cannot "take back" a notify once it has sent it to the frontend.
So notify events are only delivered between transactions. The upshot of this
is that applications using <command>NOTIFY</command> for real-time signaling
should try to keep their transactions short.
<para>
<command>NOTIFY</command> behaves like Unix signals in one important
respect: if the same condition name is signaled multiple times in quick
succession, recipients may get only one notify event for several executions
of <command>NOTIFY</command>. So it is a bad idea to depend on the number
of notifies received. Instead, use <command>NOTIFY</command> to wake up
applications that need to pay attention to something, and use a database
object (such as a sequence) to keep track of what happened or how many times
it happened.
<para>
It is common for a frontend that sends <command>NOTIFY</command> to be
listening on the same notify name itself. In that case it will get back a
notify event, just like all the other listening frontends. Depending on the
application logic, this could result in useless work --- for example,
re-reading a database table to find the same updates that that frontend just
wrote out. In <productname>Postgres</productname> 6.4 and later, it is
possible to avoid such extra work by noticing whether the notifying backend
process's PID (supplied in the notify event message) is the same as one's own
backend's PID (available from libpq). When they are the same, the notify
event is one's own work bouncing back, and can be ignored. (Despite what was
said in the preceding paragraph, this is a safe technique.
<productname>Postgres</productname> keeps self-notifies separate from notifies
arriving from other backends, so you cannot miss an outside notify by ignoring
your own notifies.)
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-3">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-10-07</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
Notes
</TITLE>
<para>
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
can be any string valid as a name;
it need not correspond to the name of any actual table. If
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
is enclosed in double-quotes, it need not even be a syntactically
valid name, but can be any string up to 31 characters long.
<para>
In some previous releases of
<productname>Postgres</productname>,
<REPLACEABLE CLASS="PARAMETER">notifyname</REPLACEABLE>
had to be enclosed in double-quotes when it did not correspond to any existing
table name, even if syntactically valid as a name. That is no longer required.
<para>
In <productname>Postgres</productname> releases prior to 6.4, the backend
PID delivered in a notify message was always the PID of the frontend's own
backend. So it was not possible to distinguish one's own notifies from other
clients' notifies in those earlier releases.
</REFSECT2>
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-2">
<TITLE>
Usage
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<ProgramListing>
-- Configure and execute a listen/notify sequence from psql
postgres=> listen virtual;
LISTEN
postgres=> notify virtual;
NOTIFY
ASYNC NOTIFY of 'virtual' from backend pid '11239' received
</ProgramListing>
</REFSECT1>
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-3">
<TITLE>
Compatibility
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-4">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-09-24</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
SQL92
</TITLE>
<PARA>
There is no <command>NOTIFY</command> statement in <acronym>SQL92</acronym>.
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-2">
<TITLE>
Usage
</TITLE>
<PARA>
<ProgramListing>
-- Configure and execute a listen/notify sequence from psql
postgres=> listen virtual;
LISTEN
postgres=> notify virtual;
NOTIFY
ASYNC NOTIFY of 'virtual' from backend pid '11239' received
</ProgramListing>
</para>
</REFSECT1>
<REFSECT1 ID="R1-SQL-NOTIFY-3">
<TITLE>
Compatibility
</TITLE>
<REFSECT2 ID="R2-SQL-NOTIFY-4">
<REFSECT2INFO>
<DATE>1998-09-24</DATE>
</REFSECT2INFO>
<TITLE>
SQL92
</TITLE>
<PARA>
There is no <command>NOTIFY</command> statement in <acronym>SQL92</acronym>.
</para>
</refsect2>
</refsect1>
</REFENTRY>