From a57695d9a815ce355e17c5cdec181f87bc9de3f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2016 17:39:33 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Fix detection of unfinished Unicode surrogate pair at end of string. The U&'...' and U&"..." syntaxes silently discarded a surrogate pair start (that is, a code between U+D800 and U+DBFF) if it occurred at the very end of the string. This seems like an obvious oversight, since we throw an error for every other invalid combination of surrogate characters, including the very same situation in E'...' syntax. This has been wrong since the pair processing was added (in 9.0), so back-patch to all supported branches. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/19113.1482337898@sss.pgh.pa.us --- src/backend/parser/scan.l | 8 ++++++++ 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+) diff --git a/src/backend/parser/scan.l b/src/backend/parser/scan.l index 5364942701c..85cf7a35cb1 100644 --- a/src/backend/parser/scan.l +++ b/src/backend/parser/scan.l @@ -1395,7 +1395,15 @@ litbuf_udeescape(unsigned char escape, core_yyscan_t yyscanner) } } + /* unfinished surrogate pair? */ + if (pair_first) + { + ADVANCE_YYLLOC(in - litbuf + 3); /* 3 for U&" */ + yyerror("invalid Unicode surrogate pair"); + } + *out = '\0'; + /* * We could skip pg_verifymbstr if we didn't process any non-7-bit-ASCII * codes; but it's probably not worth the trouble, since this isn't