database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-04 20:11:56 +03:00
Code Activity

Use PRI?64 instead of "ll?" in format strings (continued).

Browse Source 
Continuation of work started in commit 15a79c73, after initial trial.

Author: Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/b936d2fb-590d-49c3-a615-92c3a88c6c19%40eisentraut.org
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut
2025-03-29 10:30:08 +01:00
parent a0a4601765
commit a0ed19e0a9
54 changed files with 302 additions and 311 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
src/backend/utils/adt/xid8funcs.c
View File

@@ -117,8 +117,8 @@ TransactionIdInRecentPast(FullTransactionId fxid, TransactionId *extracted_xid)
if (!FullTransactionIdPrecedes(fxid, now_fullxid))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_PARAMETER_VALUE),
errmsg("transaction ID %llu is in the future",
(unsigned long long) U64FromFullTransactionId(fxid))));
errmsg("transaction ID %" PRIu64 " is in the future",
U64FromFullTransactionId(fxid))));
/*
* TransamVariables->oldestClogXid is protected by XactTruncationLock, but