From a025aa179c4ca15915ea2c523894faa31b2ca2f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 16:59:22 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] In a nestloop inner indexscan, it's OK to use pushed-down baserestrictinfo clauses even if it's an outer join. This is a corner case since such clauses could only arise from weird OUTER JOIN ON conditions, but worth fixing. Per example from Ron at cheapcomplexdevices.com. --- src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c | 6 +----- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c index 6c702c255d2..28182c23724 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ * * * IDENTIFICATION - * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c,v 1.147.4.1 2005/04/20 21:48:22 tgl Exp $ + * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/path/indxpath.c,v 1.147.4.2 2005/12/06 16:59:22 tgl Exp $ * *------------------------------------------------------------------------- */ @@ -666,10 +666,6 @@ group_clauses_by_indexkey_for_join(Query *root, { RestrictInfo *rinfo = (RestrictInfo *) lfirst(i); - /* Can't use pushed-down clauses in outer join */ - if (isouterjoin && rinfo->ispusheddown) - continue; - if (match_clause_to_indexcol(rel, index, indexcol,