database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-11 10:01:57 +03:00
Code Activity

Fix planner's handling of RETURNING lists in writable CTEs.

Browse Source 
setrefs.c failed to do "rtoffset" adjustment of Vars in RETURNING lists,
which meant they were left with the wrong varnos when the RETURNING list
was in a subquery.  That was never possible before writable CTEs, of
course, but now it's broken.  The executor fails to notice any problem
because ExecEvalVar just references the ecxt_scantuple for any normal
varno; but EXPLAIN breaks when the varno is wrong, as illustrated in a
recent complaint from Bartosz Dmytrak.

Since the eventual rtoffset of the subquery is not known at the time
we are preparing its plan node, the previous scheme of executing
set_returning_clause_references() at that time cannot handle this
adjustment.  Fortunately, it turns out that we don't really need to do it
that way, because all the needed information is available during normal
setrefs.c execution; we just have to dig it out of the ModifyTable node.
So, do that, and get rid of the kluge of early setrefs processing of
RETURNING lists.  (This is a little bit of a cheat in the case of inherited
UPDATE/DELETE, because we are not passing a "root" struct that corresponds
exactly to what the subplan was built with.  But that doesn't matter, and
anyway this is less ugly than early setrefs processing was.)

Back-patch to 9.1, where the problem became possible to hit.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2012-04-25 20:20:33 -04:00
parent c62b8eaae1
commit 9fa82c9809
6 changed files with 116 additions and 50 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c
View File

@ -4587,16 +4587,8 @@ make_modifytable(CmdType operation, bool canSetTag,
node->plan.lefttree = NULL;
node->plan.righttree = NULL;
node->plan.qual = NIL;
/*
* Set up the visible plan targetlist as being the same as the first
* RETURNING list. This is for the use of EXPLAIN; the executor won't pay
* any attention to the targetlist.
*/
if (returningLists)
node->plan.targetlist = copyObject(linitial(returningLists));
else
node->plan.targetlist = NIL;
/* setrefs.c will fill in the targetlist, if needed */
node->plan.targetlist = NIL;
node->operation = operation;
node->canSetTag = canSetTag;