1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-11-06 07:49:08 +03:00

pgindent run for release 9.3

This is the first run of the Perl-based pgindent script.  Also update
pgindent instructions.
This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2013-05-29 16:58:43 -04:00
parent 07ab261ef3
commit 9af4159fce
367 changed files with 4222 additions and 3829 deletions

View File

@@ -1210,7 +1210,7 @@ SetupLockInTable(LockMethod lockMethodTable, PGPROC *proc,
static void
RemoveLocalLock(LOCALLOCK *locallock)
{
int i;
int i;
for (i = locallock->numLockOwners - 1; i >= 0; i--)
{
@@ -1988,7 +1988,7 @@ LockReleaseAll(LOCKMETHODID lockmethodid, bool allLocks)
LOCALLOCKOWNER *lockOwners = locallock->lockOwners;
/* If session lock is above array position 0, move it down to 0 */
for (i = 0; i < locallock->numLockOwners ; i++)
for (i = 0; i < locallock->numLockOwners; i++)
{
if (lockOwners[i].owner == NULL)
lockOwners[0] = lockOwners[i];
@@ -2214,7 +2214,7 @@ LockReleaseCurrentOwner(LOCALLOCK **locallocks, int nlocks)
}
else
{
int i;
int i;
for (i = nlocks - 1; i >= 0; i--)
ReleaseLockIfHeld(locallocks[i], false);
@@ -2313,7 +2313,7 @@ LockReassignCurrentOwner(LOCALLOCK **locallocks, int nlocks)
}
else
{
int i;
int i;
for (i = nlocks - 1; i >= 0; i--)
LockReassignOwner(locallocks[i], parent);
@@ -2333,8 +2333,8 @@ LockReassignOwner(LOCALLOCK *locallock, ResourceOwner parent)
int ip = -1;
/*
* Scan to see if there are any locks belonging to current owner or
* its parent
* Scan to see if there are any locks belonging to current owner or its
* parent
*/
lockOwners = locallock->lockOwners;
for (i = locallock->numLockOwners - 1; i >= 0; i--)
@@ -2346,7 +2346,7 @@ LockReassignOwner(LOCALLOCK *locallock, ResourceOwner parent)
}
if (ic < 0)
return; /* no current locks */
return; /* no current locks */
if (ip < 0)
{
@@ -2690,9 +2690,9 @@ GetLockConflicts(const LOCKTAG *locktag, LOCKMODE lockmode)
LWLockAcquire(proc->backendLock, LW_SHARED);
/*
* If the target backend isn't referencing the same database as the
* lock, then we needn't examine the individual relation IDs at
* all; none of them can be relevant.
* If the target backend isn't referencing the same database as
* the lock, then we needn't examine the individual relation IDs
* at all; none of them can be relevant.
*
* See FastPathTransferLocks() for discussion of why we do this
* test after acquiring the lock.
@@ -3158,15 +3158,15 @@ PostPrepare_Locks(TransactionId xid)
/*
* We cannot simply modify proclock->tag.myProc to reassign
* ownership of the lock, because that's part of the hash key and
* the proclock would then be in the wrong hash chain. Instead
* the proclock would then be in the wrong hash chain. Instead
* use hash_update_hash_key. (We used to create a new hash entry,
* but that risks out-of-memory failure if other processes are
* busy making proclocks too.) We must unlink the proclock from
* busy making proclocks too.) We must unlink the proclock from
* our procLink chain and put it into the new proc's chain, too.
*
* Note: the updated proclock hash key will still belong to the
* same hash partition, cf proclock_hash(). So the partition
* lock we already hold is sufficient for this.
* same hash partition, cf proclock_hash(). So the partition lock
* we already hold is sufficient for this.
*/
SHMQueueDelete(&proclock->procLink);
@@ -3177,9 +3177,9 @@ PostPrepare_Locks(TransactionId xid)
proclocktag.myProc = newproc;
/*
* Update the proclock. We should not find any existing entry
* for the same hash key, since there can be only one entry for
* any given lock with my own proc.
* Update the proclock. We should not find any existing entry for
* the same hash key, since there can be only one entry for any
* given lock with my own proc.
*/
if (!hash_update_hash_key(LockMethodProcLockHash,
(void *) proclock,