Support Docs & Contrib

2025-07-30 11:03:19 +03:00 · 1996-08-18 22:14:33 +00:00
parent 1960a3b965
commit 9848d3655d
102 changed files with 20187 additions and 0 deletions
--- a/doc/README.flex
+++ b/doc/README.flex
@ -0,0 +1,147 @@
+From: ernst.molitor@uni-bonn.de
+
+Hi,
+
+thank you for the latest Postgres95 distribution! 
+
+>does the createuser bug still persist, or have
+>we finally worked that one out?
+
+As has been indication by Bruce Momjian, the createuser problem was
+caused by a bug in flex 2.5.3 (which has been confirmed by Vern
+Paxson, the flex maintainer - many thanks to them); the bug will be
+fixed in flex 2.5.4. Vern Paxson has been so kind as to supply me with
+a patch that will be part of the 2.5.4 release; I'm including it below
+in case someone has installed flex 2.5.3 and doesn't want to go
+back to 2.5.2...
+
+Regards,
+
+Ernst
+---
+*** flex-2.5.3/flex.skl	Sat May 25 21:02:33 1996
+--- flex.skl	Tue Jul  2 16:35:49 1996
+***************
+*** 1,7 ****
+  /* A lexical scanner generated by flex */
+
+  /* Scanner skeleton version:
+!  * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/Attic/README.flex,v 1.1.1.1 1996/08/18 22:14:17 scrappy Exp $
+   */
+
+  #define FLEX_SCANNER
+--- 1,7 ----
+  /* A lexical scanner generated by flex */
+
+  /* Scanner skeleton version:
+!  * $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/Attic/README.flex,v 1.1.1.1 1996/08/18 22:14:17 scrappy Exp $
+   */
+
+  #define FLEX_SCANNER
+***************
+*** 783,789 ****
+  		/* don't do the read, it's not guaranteed to return an EOF,
+  		 * just force an EOF
+  		 */
+! 		yy_n_chars = 0;
+
+  	else
+  		{
+--- 783,789 ----
+  		/* don't do the read, it's not guaranteed to return an EOF,
+  		 * just force an EOF
+  		 */
+! 		yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars = yy_n_chars = 0;
+
+  	else
+  		{
+***************
+*** 838,843 ****
+--- 838,845 ----
+  		/* Read in more data. */
+  		YY_INPUT( (&yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf[number_to_move]),
+  			yy_n_chars, num_to_read );
+
+ 		yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars = yy_n_chars;
+  		}
+
+  	if ( yy_n_chars == 0 )
+***************
+*** 947,953 ****
+
+  		yy_cp += (int) (dest - source);
+  		yy_bp += (int) (dest - source);
+! 		yy_n_chars = yy_current_buffer->yy_buf_size;
+
+  		if ( yy_cp < yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf + 2 )
+  			YY_FATAL_ERROR( "flex scanner push-back overflow" );
+--- 949,956 ----
+
+  		yy_cp += (int) (dest - source);
+  		yy_bp += (int) (dest - source);
+! 		yy_current_buffer->yy_n_chars =
+! 			yy_n_chars = yy_current_buffer->yy_buf_size;
+
+  		if ( yy_cp < yy_current_buffer->yy_ch_buf + 2 )
+  			YY_FATAL_ERROR( "flex scanner push-back overflow" );
+***************
+*** 997,1009 ****
+
+  			switch ( yy_get_next_buffer() )
+  				{
+  				case EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE:
+  					{
+  					if ( yywrap() )
+- 						{
+- 						yy_c_buf_p = yytext_ptr + offset;
+  						return EOF;
+- 						}
+
+  					if ( ! yy_did_buffer_switch_on_eof )
+  						YY_NEW_FILE;
+--- 1000,1025 ----
+
+  			switch ( yy_get_next_buffer() )
+  				{
+ 				case EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH:
+ 					/* This happens because yy_g_n_b()
+ 					 * sees that we've accumulated a
+ 					 * token and flags that we need to
+ 					 * try matching the token before
+ 					 * proceeding.  But for input(),
+ 					 * there's no matching to consider.
+ 					 * So convert the EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH
+ 					 * to EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE.
+ 					 */
+
+ 					/* Reset buffer status. */
+ 					yyrestart( yyin );
+
+ 					/* fall through */
+
+  				case EOB_ACT_END_OF_FILE:
+  					{
+  					if ( yywrap() )
+  						return EOF;
+
+  					if ( ! yy_did_buffer_switch_on_eof )
+  						YY_NEW_FILE;
+***************
+*** 1017,1031 ****
+  				case EOB_ACT_CONTINUE_SCAN:
+  					yy_c_buf_p = yytext_ptr + offset;
+  					break;
+-
+- 				case EOB_ACT_LAST_MATCH:
+- #ifdef __cplusplus
+- 					YY_FATAL_ERROR(
+- 					"unexpected last match in yyinput()" );
+- #else
+- 					YY_FATAL_ERROR(
+- 					"unexpected last match in input()" );
+- #endif
+  				}
+  			}
+  		}
+--- 1033,1038 ----
+