mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-11 10:01:57 +03:00
Run pgindent on 9.2 source tree in preparation for first 9.3
commit-fest.
This commit is contained in:
@ -531,7 +531,7 @@ zaptreesubs(struct vars * v,
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (t->op == '(')
|
||||
{
|
||||
int n = t->subno;
|
||||
int n = t->subno;
|
||||
|
||||
assert(n > 0);
|
||||
if ((size_t) n < v->nmatch)
|
||||
@ -948,7 +948,7 @@ citerdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need workspace to track the endpoints of each sub-match. Normally
|
||||
* We need workspace to track the endpoints of each sub-match. Normally
|
||||
* we consider only nonzero-length sub-matches, so there can be at most
|
||||
* end-begin of them. However, if min is larger than that, we will also
|
||||
* consider zero-length sub-matches in order to find enough matches.
|
||||
@ -977,8 +977,8 @@ citerdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Our strategy is to first find a set of sub-match endpoints that are
|
||||
* valid according to the child node's DFA, and then recursively dissect
|
||||
* each sub-match to confirm validity. If any validity check fails,
|
||||
* backtrack the last sub-match and try again. And, when we next try for
|
||||
* each sub-match to confirm validity. If any validity check fails,
|
||||
* backtrack the last sub-match and try again. And, when we next try for
|
||||
* a validity check, we need not recheck any successfully verified
|
||||
* sub-matches that we didn't move the endpoints of. nverified remembers
|
||||
* how many sub-matches are currently known okay.
|
||||
@ -1028,10 +1028,10 @@ citerdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've identified a way to divide the string into k sub-matches
|
||||
* that works so far as the child DFA can tell. If k is an allowed
|
||||
* number of matches, start the slow part: recurse to verify each
|
||||
* sub-match. We always have k <= max_matches, needn't check that.
|
||||
* We've identified a way to divide the string into k sub-matches that
|
||||
* works so far as the child DFA can tell. If k is an allowed number
|
||||
* of matches, start the slow part: recurse to verify each sub-match.
|
||||
* We always have k <= max_matches, needn't check that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (k < min_matches)
|
||||
goto backtrack;
|
||||
@ -1065,13 +1065,14 @@ citerdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
/* match failed to verify, so backtrack */
|
||||
|
||||
backtrack:
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Must consider shorter versions of the current sub-match. However,
|
||||
* we'll only ask for a zero-length match if necessary.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (k > 0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
chr *prev_end = endpts[k - 1];
|
||||
chr *prev_end = endpts[k - 1];
|
||||
|
||||
if (endpts[k] > prev_end)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@ -1132,7 +1133,7 @@ creviterdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We need workspace to track the endpoints of each sub-match. Normally
|
||||
* We need workspace to track the endpoints of each sub-match. Normally
|
||||
* we consider only nonzero-length sub-matches, so there can be at most
|
||||
* end-begin of them. However, if min is larger than that, we will also
|
||||
* consider zero-length sub-matches in order to find enough matches.
|
||||
@ -1161,8 +1162,8 @@ creviterdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Our strategy is to first find a set of sub-match endpoints that are
|
||||
* valid according to the child node's DFA, and then recursively dissect
|
||||
* each sub-match to confirm validity. If any validity check fails,
|
||||
* backtrack the last sub-match and try again. And, when we next try for
|
||||
* each sub-match to confirm validity. If any validity check fails,
|
||||
* backtrack the last sub-match and try again. And, when we next try for
|
||||
* a validity check, we need not recheck any successfully verified
|
||||
* sub-matches that we didn't move the endpoints of. nverified remembers
|
||||
* how many sub-matches are currently known okay.
|
||||
@ -1214,10 +1215,10 @@ creviterdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We've identified a way to divide the string into k sub-matches
|
||||
* that works so far as the child DFA can tell. If k is an allowed
|
||||
* number of matches, start the slow part: recurse to verify each
|
||||
* sub-match. We always have k <= max_matches, needn't check that.
|
||||
* We've identified a way to divide the string into k sub-matches that
|
||||
* works so far as the child DFA can tell. If k is an allowed number
|
||||
* of matches, start the slow part: recurse to verify each sub-match.
|
||||
* We always have k <= max_matches, needn't check that.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (k < min_matches)
|
||||
goto backtrack;
|
||||
@ -1251,6 +1252,7 @@ creviterdissect(struct vars * v,
|
||||
/* match failed to verify, so backtrack */
|
||||
|
||||
backtrack:
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Must consider longer versions of the current sub-match.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user