mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-30 11:03:19 +03:00
Reinstate HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY|HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED as allowed
Commit 866e24d47d
added an assert that HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY and
HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED cannot appear together, on the faulty assumption that
the latter necessarily referred to an update and not a tuple lock; but
that's wrong, because SELECT FOR UPDATE can use precisely that
combination, as evidenced by the amcheck test case added here.
Remove the Assert(), and also patch amcheck's verify_heapam.c to not
complain if the combination is found. Also, out of overabundance of
caution, update (across all branches) README.tuplock to be more explicit
about this.
Author: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Mahendra Singh Thalor <mahi6run@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut@gmail.com>
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20210124061758.GA11756@nol
This commit is contained in:
@ -608,13 +608,6 @@ check_tuple_header_and_visibilty(HeapTupleHeader tuphdr, HeapCheckContext *ctx)
|
||||
ctx->tuphdr->t_hoff, ctx->lp_len));
|
||||
header_garbled = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if ((ctx->tuphdr->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY) &&
|
||||
(ctx->tuphdr->t_infomask2 & HEAP_KEYS_UPDATED))
|
||||
{
|
||||
report_corruption(ctx,
|
||||
pstrdup("tuple is marked as only locked, but also claims key columns were updated"));
|
||||
header_garbled = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ctx->tuphdr->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_COMMITTED) &&
|
||||
(ctx->tuphdr->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_IS_MULTI))
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user