1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-06-27 23:21:58 +03:00

Fix numeric width_bucket() to allow its first argument to be infinite.

While the calculation is not well-defined if the bounds arguments are
infinite, there is a perfectly sane outcome if the test operand is
infinite: it's just like any other value that's before the first bucket
or after the last one.  width_bucket_float8() got this right, but
I was too hasty about the case when adding infinities to numerics
(commit a57d312a7), so that width_bucket_numeric() just rejected it.
Fix that, and sync the relevant error message strings.

No back-patch needed, since infinities-in-numeric haven't shipped yet.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2465409.1602170063@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2020-10-08 12:37:59 -04:00
parent b90b79e140
commit 8ce423b191
3 changed files with 21 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@ -1724,10 +1724,11 @@ width_bucket_numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_ARGUMENT_FOR_WIDTH_BUCKET_FUNCTION),
errmsg("operand, lower bound, and upper bound cannot be NaN")));
else
/* We allow "operand" to be infinite; cmp_numerics will cope */
if (NUMERIC_IS_INF(bound1) || NUMERIC_IS_INF(bound2))
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_ARGUMENT_FOR_WIDTH_BUCKET_FUNCTION),
errmsg("operand, lower bound, and upper bound cannot be infinity")));
errmsg("lower and upper bounds must be finite")));
}
init_var(&result_var);