mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-06-27 23:21:58 +03:00
Fix numeric width_bucket() to allow its first argument to be infinite.
While the calculation is not well-defined if the bounds arguments are
infinite, there is a perfectly sane outcome if the test operand is
infinite: it's just like any other value that's before the first bucket
or after the last one. width_bucket_float8() got this right, but
I was too hasty about the case when adding infinities to numerics
(commit a57d312a7
), so that width_bucket_numeric() just rejected it.
Fix that, and sync the relevant error message strings.
No back-patch needed, since infinities-in-numeric haven't shipped yet.
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2465409.1602170063@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
@ -1724,10 +1724,11 @@ width_bucket_numeric(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
|
||||
ereport(ERROR,
|
||||
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_ARGUMENT_FOR_WIDTH_BUCKET_FUNCTION),
|
||||
errmsg("operand, lower bound, and upper bound cannot be NaN")));
|
||||
else
|
||||
/* We allow "operand" to be infinite; cmp_numerics will cope */
|
||||
if (NUMERIC_IS_INF(bound1) || NUMERIC_IS_INF(bound2))
|
||||
ereport(ERROR,
|
||||
(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_ARGUMENT_FOR_WIDTH_BUCKET_FUNCTION),
|
||||
errmsg("operand, lower bound, and upper bound cannot be infinity")));
|
||||
errmsg("lower and upper bounds must be finite")));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
init_var(&result_var);
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user