database/postgres
database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-05-03 22:24:49 +03:00
Code

Fix C99isms introduced when backpatching atomics / spinlock tests.

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Andres Freund 2020-06-18 15:12:09 -07:00
parent 8bc13287ed
commit 86593365ce
1 changed files with 8 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
src/test/regress/regress.c
View File

@ -1131,20 +1131,22 @@ test_spinlock(void)
*/
#ifndef HAVE_SPINLOCKS
{
uint32 i;
/*
* Initialize enough spinlocks to advance counter close to
* wraparound. It's too expensive to perform acquire/release for each,
* as those may be syscalls when the spinlock emulation is used (and
* even just atomic TAS would be expensive).
*/
for (uint32 i = 0; i < INT32_MAX - 100000; i++)
for (i = 0; i < INT32_MAX - 100000; i++)
{
slock_t lock;
SpinLockInit(&lock);
}
for (uint32 i = 0; i < 200000; i++)
for (i = 0; i < 200000; i++)
{
slock_t lock;
@ -1179,23 +1181,24 @@ test_atomic_spin_nest(void)
slock_t lock;
#define NUM_TEST_ATOMICS (NUM_SPINLOCK_SEMAPHORES + NUM_ATOMICS_SEMAPHORES + 27)
pg_atomic_uint32 atomics32[NUM_TEST_ATOMICS];
int i;
SpinLockInit(&lock);
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
{
pg_atomic_init_u32(&atomics32[i], 0);
}
/* just so it's not all zeroes */
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
{
EXPECT_EQ_U32(pg_atomic_fetch_add_u32(&atomics32[i], i), 0);
}
/* test whether we can do atomic op with lock held */
SpinLockAcquire(&lock);
for (int i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
for (i = 0; i < NUM_TEST_ATOMICS; i++)
{
EXPECT_EQ_U32(pg_atomic_fetch_sub_u32(&atomics32[i], i), i);
EXPECT_EQ_U32(pg_atomic_read_u32(&atomics32[i]), 0);