database/postgres
database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-05-18 17:41:14 +03:00
Code

Remove obsolete comment

Browse Source 
The idea to use a union in the definition of RangeTblEntry is clearly
not being pursued.

Reviewed-by: Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>
Discussion: https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/flat/4b27fc50-8cd6-46f5-ab20-88dbaadca645@eisentraut.org
This commit is contained in:
Peter Eisentraut 2024-03-22 07:12:28 +01:00
parent 085e759e9d
commit 83d8065b1f
1 changed files with 0 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
src/include/nodes/parsenodes.h
View File

@ -1029,12 +1029,6 @@ typedef struct RangeTblEntry
RTEKind rtekind; /* see above */ RTEKind rtekind; /* see above */
/*
* XXX the fields applicable to only some rte kinds should be merged into
* a union. I didn't do this yet because the diffs would impact a lot of
* code that is being actively worked on. FIXME someday.
*/
/* /*
* Fields valid for a plain relation RTE (else zero): * Fields valid for a plain relation RTE (else zero):
* *