Fix planner failure in some cases of sorting by an aggregate.

An oversight introduced by the incremental-sort patches caused
"could not find pathkey item to sort" errors in some situations
where a sort key involves an aggregate or window function.

The basic problem here is that find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel
isn't properly modeling what prepare_sort_from_pathkeys will do
later.  Rather than hoping we can keep those functions in sync,
let's refactor so that they actually share the code for
identifying a suitable sort expression.

With this refactoring, tlist.c's tlist_member_ignore_relabel
is unused.  I removed it in HEAD but left it in place in v13,
in case any extensions are using it.

Per report from Luc Vlaming.  Back-patch to v13 where the
problem arose.

James Coleman and Tom Lane

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/91f3ec99-85a4-fa55-ea74-33f85a5c651f@swarm64.com

src/backend/optimizer/path/equivclass.c

@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 static EquivalenceMember *add_eq_member(EquivalenceClass *ec,
 										Expr *expr, Relids relids, Relids nullable_relids,
 										bool is_child, Oid datatype);
+static bool is_exprlist_member(Expr *node, List *exprs);
 static void generate_base_implied_equalities_const(PlannerInfo *root,
 												   EquivalenceClass *ec);
 static void generate_base_implied_equalities_no_const(PlannerInfo *root,
@@ -770,6 +771,167 @@ get_eclass_for_sort_expr(PlannerInfo *root,
 	return newec;
 }
 
+/*
+ * find_ec_member_matching_expr
+ *		Locate an EquivalenceClass member matching the given expr, if any;
+ *		return NULL if no match.
+ *
+ * "Matching" is defined as "equal after stripping RelabelTypes".
+ * This is used for identifying sort expressions, and we need to allow
+ * binary-compatible relabeling for some cases involving binary-compatible
+ * sort operators.
+ *
+ * Child EC members are ignored unless they belong to given 'relids'.
+ */
+EquivalenceMember *
+find_ec_member_matching_expr(EquivalenceClass *ec,
+							 Expr *expr,
+							 Relids relids)
+{
+	ListCell   *lc;
+
+	/* We ignore binary-compatible relabeling on both ends */
+	while (expr && IsA(expr, RelabelType))
+		expr = ((RelabelType *) expr)->arg;
+
+	foreach(lc, ec->ec_members)
+	{
+		EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc);
+		Expr	   *emexpr;
+
+		/*
+		 * We shouldn't be trying to sort by an equivalence class that
+		 * contains a constant, so no need to consider such cases any further.
+		 */
+		if (em->em_is_const)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Ignore child members unless they belong to the requested rel.
+		 */
+		if (em->em_is_child &&
+			!bms_is_subset(em->em_relids, relids))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Match if same expression (after stripping relabel).
+		 */
+		emexpr = em->em_expr;
+		while (emexpr && IsA(emexpr, RelabelType))
+			emexpr = ((RelabelType *) emexpr)->arg;
+
+		if (equal(emexpr, expr))
+			return em;
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * find_computable_ec_member
+ *		Locate an EquivalenceClass member that can be computed from the
+ *		expressions appearing in "exprs"; return NULL if no match.
+ *
+ * "exprs" can be either a list of bare expression trees, or a list of
+ * TargetEntry nodes.  Either way, it should contain Vars and possibly
+ * Aggrefs and WindowFuncs, which are matched to the corresponding elements
+ * of the EquivalenceClass's expressions.
+ *
+ * Unlike find_ec_member_matching_expr, there's no special provision here
+ * for binary-compatible relabeling.  This is intentional: if we have to
+ * compute an expression in this way, setrefs.c is going to insist on exact
+ * matches of Vars to the source tlist.
+ *
+ * Child EC members are ignored unless they belong to given 'relids'.
+ * Also, non-parallel-safe expressions are ignored if 'require_parallel_safe'.
+ *
+ * Note: some callers pass root == NULL for notational reasons.  This is OK
+ * when require_parallel_safe is false.
+ */
+EquivalenceMember *
+find_computable_ec_member(PlannerInfo *root,
+						  EquivalenceClass *ec,
+						  List *exprs,
+						  Relids relids,
+						  bool require_parallel_safe)
+{
+	ListCell   *lc;
+
+	foreach(lc, ec->ec_members)
+	{
+		EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc);
+		List	   *exprvars;
+		ListCell   *lc2;
+
+		/*
+		 * We shouldn't be trying to sort by an equivalence class that
+		 * contains a constant, so no need to consider such cases any further.
+		 */
+		if (em->em_is_const)
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Ignore child members unless they belong to the requested rel.
+		 */
+		if (em->em_is_child &&
+			!bms_is_subset(em->em_relids, relids))
+			continue;
+
+		/*
+		 * Match if all Vars and quasi-Vars are available in "exprs".
+		 */
+		exprvars = pull_var_clause((Node *) em->em_expr,
+								   PVC_INCLUDE_AGGREGATES |
+								   PVC_INCLUDE_WINDOWFUNCS |
+								   PVC_INCLUDE_PLACEHOLDERS);
+		foreach(lc2, exprvars)
+		{
+			if (!is_exprlist_member(lfirst(lc2), exprs))
+				break;
+		}
+		list_free(exprvars);
+		if (lc2)
+			continue;			/* we hit a non-available Var */
+
+		/*
+		 * If requested, reject expressions that are not parallel-safe.  We
+		 * check this last because it's a rather expensive test.
+		 */
+		if (require_parallel_safe &&
+			!is_parallel_safe(root, (Node *) em->em_expr))
+			continue;
+
+		return em;				/* found usable expression */
+	}
+
+	return NULL;
+}
+
+/*
+ * is_exprlist_member
+ *	  Subroutine for find_computable_ec_member: is "node" in "exprs"?
+ *
+ * Per the requirements of that function, "exprs" might or might not have
+ * TargetEntry superstructure.
+ */
+static bool
+is_exprlist_member(Expr *node, List *exprs)
+{
+	ListCell   *lc;
+
+	foreach(lc, exprs)
+	{
+		Expr	   *expr = (Expr *) lfirst(lc);
+
+		if (expr && IsA(expr, TargetEntry))
+			expr = ((TargetEntry *) expr)->expr;
+
+		if (equal(node, expr))
+			return true;
+	}
+	return false;
+}
+
 /*
  * Find an equivalence class member expression, all of whose Vars, come from
  * the indicated relation.
@@ -800,71 +962,78 @@ find_em_expr_for_rel(EquivalenceClass *ec, RelOptInfo *rel)
 }
 
 /*
- * Find an equivalence class member expression that can be safely used to build
+ * Find an equivalence class member expression that can be used to build
- * a sort node using the provided relation. The rules are a subset of those
+ * a sort node using the provided relation; return NULL if no candidate.
- * applied in prepare_sort_from_pathkeys since that function deals with sorts
+ *
- * that must be delayed until the last stages of query execution, while here
+ * To succeed, we must find an EC member that prepare_sort_from_pathkeys knows
- * we only care about proactive sorts.
+ * how to sort on, given the rel's reltarget as input.  There are also a few
+ * additional constraints based on the fact that the desired sort will be done
+ * within the scan/join part of the plan.  Also, non-parallel-safe expressions
+ * are ignored if 'require_parallel_safe'.
  */
 Expr *
 find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel(PlannerInfo *root, EquivalenceClass *ec,
 									RelOptInfo *rel, bool require_parallel_safe)
 {
-	ListCell   *lc_em;
+	PathTarget *target = rel->reltarget;
+	EquivalenceMember *em;
+	ListCell   *lc;
 
 	/*
-	 * If there is more than one equivalence member matching these
+	 * Reject volatile ECs immediately; such sorts must always be postponed.
-	 * requirements we'll be content to choose any one of them.
 	 */
-	foreach(lc_em, ec->ec_members)
+	if (ec->ec_has_volatile)
+		return NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Try to find an EM directly matching some reltarget member.
+	 */
+	foreach(lc, target->exprs)
 	{
-		EquivalenceMember *em = lfirst(lc_em);
+		Expr	   *targetexpr = (Expr *) lfirst(lc);
-		Expr	   *em_expr = em->em_expr;
 
-		/*
+		em = find_ec_member_matching_expr(ec, targetexpr, rel->relids);
-		 * We shouldn't be trying to sort by an equivalence class that
+		if (!em)
-		 * contains a constant, so no need to consider such cases any further.
-		 */
-		if (em->em_is_const)
 			continue;
 
 		/*
-		 * Any Vars in the equivalence class member need to come from this
+		 * Reject expressions involving set-returning functions, as those
-		 * relation. This is a superset of prepare_sort_from_pathkeys ignoring
+		 * can't be computed early either.  (Note: this test and the following
-		 * child members unless they belong to the rel being sorted.
+		 * one are effectively checking properties of targetexpr, so there's
+		 * no point in asking whether some other EC member would be better.)
 		 */
-		if (!bms_is_subset(em->em_relids, rel->relids))
+		if (IS_SRF_CALL((Node *) em->em_expr))
 			continue;
 
 		/*
-		 * If requested, reject expressions that are not parallel-safe.
+		 * If requested, reject expressions that are not parallel-safe.  We
+		 * check this last because it's a rather expensive test.
 		 */
-		if (require_parallel_safe && !is_parallel_safe(root, (Node *) em_expr))
+		if (require_parallel_safe &&
+			!is_parallel_safe(root, (Node *) em->em_expr))
 			continue;
 
-		/*
+		return em->em_expr;
-		 * Disallow SRFs so that all of them can be evaluated at the correct
-		 * time as determined by make_sort_input_target.
-		 */
-		if (IS_SRF_CALL((Node *) em_expr))
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * As long as the expression isn't volatile then
-		 * prepare_sort_from_pathkeys is able to generate a new target entry,
-		 * so there's no need to verify that one already exists.
-		 *
-		 * While prepare_sort_from_pathkeys has to be concerned about matching
-		 * up a volatile expression to the proper tlist entry, it doesn't seem
-		 * valuable here to expend the work trying to find a match in the
-		 * target's exprs since such a sort will have to be postponed anyway.
-		 */
-		if (!ec->ec_has_volatile)
-			return em->em_expr;
 	}
 
-	/* We didn't find any suitable equivalence class expression */
+	/*
-	return NULL;
+	 * Try to find a expression computable from the reltarget.
+	 */
+	em = find_computable_ec_member(root, ec, target->exprs, rel->relids,
+								   require_parallel_safe);
+	if (!em)
+		return NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Reject expressions involving set-returning functions, as those can't be
+	 * computed early either.  (There's no point in looking for another EC
+	 * member in this case; since SRFs can't appear in WHERE, they cannot
+	 * belong to multi-member ECs.)
+	 */
+	if (IS_SRF_CALL((Node *) em->em_expr))
+		return NULL;
+
+	return em->em_expr;
 }
 
 /*

src/backend/optimizer/plan/createplan.c

@@ -259,9 +259,6 @@ static Plan *prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 										Oid **p_sortOperators,
 										Oid **p_collations,
 										bool **p_nullsFirst);
-static EquivalenceMember *find_ec_member_for_tle(EquivalenceClass *ec,
-												 TargetEntry *tle,
-												 Relids relids);
 static Sort *make_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 									 Relids relids);
 static IncrementalSort *make_incrementalsort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree,
@@ -1993,7 +1990,7 @@ create_sort_plan(PlannerInfo *root, SortPath *best_path, int flags)
 								  flags | CP_SMALL_TLIST);
 
 	/*
-	 * make_sort_from_pathkeys() indirectly calls find_ec_member_for_tle(),
+	 * make_sort_from_pathkeys indirectly calls find_ec_member_matching_expr,
 	 * which will ignore any child EC members that don't belong to the given
 	 * relids. Thus, if this sort path is based on a child relation, we must
 	 * pass its relids.
@@ -5844,9 +5841,6 @@ make_incrementalsort(Plan *lefttree, int numCols, int nPresortedCols,
  *
  * Returns the node which is to be the input to the Sort (either lefttree,
  * or a Result stacked atop lefttree).
- *
- * Note: Restrictions on what expressions are safely sortable may also need to
- * be added to find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel.
  */
 static Plan *
 prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
@@ -5916,7 +5910,7 @@ prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 			tle = get_tle_by_resno(tlist, reqColIdx[numsortkeys]);
 			if (tle)
 			{
-				em = find_ec_member_for_tle(ec, tle, relids);
+				em = find_ec_member_matching_expr(ec, tle->expr, relids);
 				if (em)
 				{
 					/* found expr at right place in tlist */
@@ -5947,7 +5941,7 @@ prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 			foreach(j, tlist)
 			{
 				tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(j);
-				em = find_ec_member_for_tle(ec, tle, relids);
+				em = find_ec_member_matching_expr(ec, tle->expr, relids);
 				if (em)
 				{
 					/* found expr already in tlist */
@@ -5961,56 +5955,12 @@ prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 		if (!tle)
 		{
 			/*
-			 * No matching tlist item; look for a computable expression. Note
+			 * No matching tlist item; look for a computable expression.
-			 * that we treat Aggrefs as if they were variables; this is
-			 * necessary when attempting to sort the output from an Agg node
-			 * for use in a WindowFunc (since grouping_planner will have
-			 * treated the Aggrefs as variables, too).  Likewise, if we find a
-			 * WindowFunc in a sort expression, treat it as a variable.
 			 */
-			Expr	   *sortexpr = NULL;
+			em = find_computable_ec_member(NULL, ec, tlist, relids, false);
-
+			if (!em)
-			foreach(j, ec->ec_members)
-			{
-				EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(j);
-				List	   *exprvars;
-				ListCell   *k;
-
-				/*
-				 * We shouldn't be trying to sort by an equivalence class that
-				 * contains a constant, so no need to consider such cases any
-				 * further.
-				 */
-				if (em->em_is_const)
-					continue;
-
-				/*
-				 * Ignore child members unless they belong to the rel being
-				 * sorted.
-				 */
-				if (em->em_is_child &&
-					!bms_is_subset(em->em_relids, relids))
-					continue;
-
-				sortexpr = em->em_expr;
-				exprvars = pull_var_clause((Node *) sortexpr,
-										   PVC_INCLUDE_AGGREGATES |
-										   PVC_INCLUDE_WINDOWFUNCS |
-										   PVC_INCLUDE_PLACEHOLDERS);
-				foreach(k, exprvars)
-				{
-					if (!tlist_member_ignore_relabel(lfirst(k), tlist))
-						break;
-				}
-				list_free(exprvars);
-				if (!k)
-				{
-					pk_datatype = em->em_datatype;
-					break;		/* found usable expression */
-				}
-			}
-			if (!j)
 				elog(ERROR, "could not find pathkey item to sort");
+			pk_datatype = em->em_datatype;
 
 			/*
 			 * Do we need to insert a Result node?
@@ -6030,7 +5980,7 @@ prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 			/*
 			 * Add resjunk entry to input's tlist
 			 */
-			tle = makeTargetEntry(sortexpr,
+			tle = makeTargetEntry(copyObject(em->em_expr),
 								  list_length(tlist) + 1,
 								  NULL,
 								  true);
@@ -6069,56 +6019,6 @@ prepare_sort_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys,
 	return lefttree;
 }
 
-/*
- * find_ec_member_for_tle
- *		Locate an EquivalenceClass member matching the given TLE, if any
- *
- * Child EC members are ignored unless they belong to given 'relids'.
- */
-static EquivalenceMember *
-find_ec_member_for_tle(EquivalenceClass *ec,
-					   TargetEntry *tle,
-					   Relids relids)
-{
-	Expr	   *tlexpr;
-	ListCell   *lc;
-
-	/* We ignore binary-compatible relabeling on both ends */
-	tlexpr = tle->expr;
-	while (tlexpr && IsA(tlexpr, RelabelType))
-		tlexpr = ((RelabelType *) tlexpr)->arg;
-
-	foreach(lc, ec->ec_members)
-	{
-		EquivalenceMember *em = (EquivalenceMember *) lfirst(lc);
-		Expr	   *emexpr;
-
-		/*
-		 * We shouldn't be trying to sort by an equivalence class that
-		 * contains a constant, so no need to consider such cases any further.
-		 */
-		if (em->em_is_const)
-			continue;
-
-		/*
-		 * Ignore child members unless they belong to the rel being sorted.
-		 */
-		if (em->em_is_child &&
-			!bms_is_subset(em->em_relids, relids))
-			continue;
-
-		/* Match if same expression (after stripping relabel) */
-		emexpr = em->em_expr;
-		while (emexpr && IsA(emexpr, RelabelType))
-			emexpr = ((RelabelType *) emexpr)->arg;
-
-		if (equal(emexpr, tlexpr))
-			return em;
-	}
-
-	return NULL;
-}
-
 /*
  * make_sort_from_pathkeys
  *	  Create sort plan to sort according to given pathkeys
@@ -6558,7 +6458,7 @@ make_unique_from_pathkeys(Plan *lefttree, List *pathkeys, int numCols)
 			foreach(j, plan->targetlist)
 			{
 				tle = (TargetEntry *) lfirst(j);
-				em = find_ec_member_for_tle(ec, tle, NULL);
+				em = find_ec_member_matching_expr(ec, tle->expr, NULL);
 				if (em)
 				{
 					/* found expr already in tlist */

src/include/optimizer/paths.h

@@ -135,6 +135,14 @@ extern EquivalenceClass *get_eclass_for_sort_expr(PlannerInfo *root,
 												  Index sortref,
 												  Relids rel,
 												  bool create_it);
+extern EquivalenceMember *find_ec_member_matching_expr(EquivalenceClass *ec,
+													   Expr *expr,
+													   Relids relids);
+extern EquivalenceMember *find_computable_ec_member(PlannerInfo *root,
+													EquivalenceClass *ec,
+													List *exprs,
+													Relids relids,
+													bool require_parallel_safe);
 extern Expr *find_em_expr_for_rel(EquivalenceClass *ec, RelOptInfo *rel);
 extern Expr *find_em_expr_usable_for_sorting_rel(PlannerInfo *root,
 												 EquivalenceClass *ec,

src/test/regress/expected/incremental_sort.out

@@ -1577,6 +1577,32 @@ order by 1, 2;
    ->  Function Scan on generate_series
 (7 rows)
 
+-- Parallel sort with an aggregate that can be safely generated in parallel,
+-- but we can't sort by partial aggregate values.
+explain (costs off) select count(*)
+from tenk1 t1
+join tenk1 t2 on t1.unique1 = t2.unique2
+join tenk1 t3 on t2.unique1 = t3.unique1
+order by count(*);
+                                          QUERY PLAN                                           
+-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
+ Sort
+   Sort Key: (count(*))
+   ->  Finalize Aggregate
+         ->  Gather
+               Workers Planned: 2
+               ->  Partial Aggregate
+                     ->  Parallel Hash Join
+                           Hash Cond: (t2.unique1 = t3.unique1)
+                           ->  Parallel Hash Join
+                                 Hash Cond: (t1.unique1 = t2.unique2)
+                                 ->  Parallel Index Only Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 t1
+                                 ->  Parallel Hash
+                                       ->  Parallel Index Scan using tenk1_unique2 on tenk1 t2
+                           ->  Parallel Hash
+                                 ->  Parallel Index Only Scan using tenk1_unique1 on tenk1 t3
+(15 rows)
+
 -- Parallel sort but with expression (correlated subquery) that
 -- is prohibited in parallel plans.
 explain (costs off) select distinct

src/test/regress/sql/incremental_sort.sql

@@ -257,6 +257,13 @@ from tenk1, lateral (select tenk1.unique1 from generate_series(1, 1000)) as sub;
 explain (costs off) select sub.unique1, md5(stringu1)
 from tenk1, lateral (select tenk1.unique1 from generate_series(1, 1000)) as sub
 order by 1, 2;
+-- Parallel sort with an aggregate that can be safely generated in parallel,
+-- but we can't sort by partial aggregate values.
+explain (costs off) select count(*)
+from tenk1 t1
+join tenk1 t2 on t1.unique1 = t2.unique2
+join tenk1 t3 on t2.unique1 = t3.unique1
+order by count(*);
 -- Parallel sort but with expression (correlated subquery) that
 -- is prohibited in parallel plans.
 explain (costs off) select distinct