Fix failure in WHERE CURRENT OF after rewinding the referenced cursor.

In a case where we have multiple relation-scan nodes in a cursor plan,
such as a scan of an inheritance tree, it's possible to fetch from a
given scan node, then rewind the cursor and fetch some row from an
earlier scan node.  In such a case, execCurrent.c mistakenly thought
that the later scan node was still active, because ExecReScan hadn't
done anything to make it look not-active.  We'd get some sort of
failure in the case of a SeqScan node, because the node's scan tuple
slot would be pointing at a HeapTuple whose t_self gets reset to
invalid by heapam.c.  But it seems possible that for other relation
scan node types we'd actually return a valid tuple TID to the caller,
resulting in updating or deleting a tuple that shouldn't have been
considered current.  To fix, forcibly clear the ScanTupleSlot in
ExecScanReScan.

Another issue here, which seems only latent at the moment but could
easily become a live bug in future, is that rewinding a cursor does
not necessarily lead to *immediately* applying ExecReScan to every
scan-level node in the plan tree.  Upper-level nodes will think that
they can postpone that call if their child node is already marked
with chgParam flags.  I don't see a way for that to happen today in
a plan tree that's simple enough for execCurrent.c's search_plan_tree
to understand, but that's one heck of a fragile assumption.  So, add
some logic in search_plan_tree to detect chgParam flags being set on
nodes that it descended to/through, and assume that that means we
should consider lower scan nodes to be logically reset even if their
ReScan call hasn't actually happened yet.

Per bug #15395 from Matvey Arye.  This has been broken for a long time,
so back-patch to all supported branches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/153764171023.14986.280404050547008575@wrigleys.postgresql.org

src/backend/executor/execCurrent.c

@@ -23,7 +23,8 @@
 
 
 static char *fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId);
-static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid);
+static ScanState *search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid,
+				 bool *pending_rescan);
 
 
 /*
@@ -156,8 +157,10 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr,
 		 * aggregation.
 		 */
 		ScanState  *scanstate;
+		bool		pending_rescan = false;
 
-		scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid);
+		scanstate = search_plan_tree(queryDesc->planstate, table_oid,
+									 &pending_rescan);
 		if (!scanstate)
 			ereport(ERROR,
 					(errcode(ERRCODE_INVALID_CURSOR_STATE),
@@ -177,8 +180,12 @@ execCurrentOf(CurrentOfExpr *cexpr,
 					 errmsg("cursor \"%s\" is not positioned on a row",
 							cursor_name)));
 
-		/* Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan */
+		/*
-		if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot))
+		 * Now OK to return false if we found an inactive scan.  It is
+		 * inactive either if it's not positioned on a row, or there's a
+		 * rescan pending for it.
+		 */
+		if (TupIsNull(scanstate->ss_ScanTupleSlot) || pending_rescan)
 			return false;
 
 		/*
@@ -288,10 +295,20 @@ fetch_cursor_param_value(ExprContext *econtext, int paramId)
  *
  * Search through a PlanState tree for a scan node on the specified table.
  * Return NULL if not found or multiple candidates.
+ *
+ * If a candidate is found, set *pending_rescan to true if that candidate
+ * or any node above it has a pending rescan action, i.e. chgParam != NULL.
+ * That indicates that we shouldn't consider the node to be positioned on a
+ * valid tuple, even if its own state would indicate that it is.  (Caller
+ * must initialize *pending_rescan to false, and should not trust its state
+ * if multiple candidates are found.)
  */
 static ScanState *
-search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
+search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid,
+				 bool *pending_rescan)
 {
+	ScanState  *result = NULL;
+
 	if (node == NULL)
 		return NULL;
 	switch (nodeTag(node))
@@ -311,7 +328,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 				ScanState  *sstate = (ScanState *) node;
 
 				if (RelationGetRelid(sstate->ss_currentRelation) == table_oid)
-					return sstate;
+					result = sstate;
 				break;
 			}
 
@@ -322,13 +339,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 		case T_AppendState:
 			{
 				AppendState *astate = (AppendState *) node;
-				ScanState  *result = NULL;
 				int			i;
 
 				for (i = 0; i < astate->as_nplans; i++)
 				{
 					ScanState  *elem = search_plan_tree(astate->appendplans[i],
-														table_oid);
+														table_oid,
+														pending_rescan);
 
 					if (!elem)
 						continue;
@@ -336,7 +353,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 						return NULL;	/* multiple matches */
 					result = elem;
 				}
-				return result;
+				break;
 			}
 
 			/*
@@ -345,13 +362,13 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 		case T_MergeAppendState:
 			{
 				MergeAppendState *mstate = (MergeAppendState *) node;
-				ScanState  *result = NULL;
 				int			i;
 
 				for (i = 0; i < mstate->ms_nplans; i++)
 				{
 					ScanState  *elem = search_plan_tree(mstate->mergeplans[i],
-														table_oid);
+														table_oid,
+														pending_rescan);
 
 					if (!elem)
 						continue;
@@ -359,7 +376,7 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 						return NULL;	/* multiple matches */
 					result = elem;
 				}
-				return result;
+				break;
 			}
 
 			/*
@@ -368,18 +385,31 @@ search_plan_tree(PlanState *node, Oid table_oid)
 			 */
 		case T_ResultState:
 		case T_LimitState:
-			return search_plan_tree(node->lefttree, table_oid);
+			result = search_plan_tree(node->lefttree,
+									  table_oid,
+									  pending_rescan);
+			break;
 
 			/*
 			 * SubqueryScan too, but it keeps the child in a different place
 			 */
 		case T_SubqueryScanState:
-			return search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan,
+			result = search_plan_tree(((SubqueryScanState *) node)->subplan,
-									table_oid);
+									  table_oid,
+									  pending_rescan);
+			break;
 
 		default:
 			/* Otherwise, assume we can't descend through it */
 			break;
 	}
-	return NULL;
+
+	/*
+	 * If we found a candidate at or below this node, then this node's
+	 * chgParam indicates a pending rescan that will affect the candidate.
+	 */
+	if (result && node->chgParam != NULL)
+		*pending_rescan = true;
+
+	return result;
 }

src/backend/executor/execScan.c

@@ -355,6 +355,12 @@ ExecScanReScan(ScanState *node)
 	/* Stop projecting any tuples from SRFs in the targetlist */
 	node->ps.ps_TupFromTlist = false;
 
+	/*
+	 * We must clear the scan tuple so that observers (e.g., execCurrent.c)
+	 * can tell that this plan node is not positioned on a tuple.
+	 */
+	ExecClearTuple(node->ss_ScanTupleSlot);
+
 	/* Rescan EvalPlanQual tuple if we're inside an EvalPlanQual recheck */
 	if (estate->es_epqScanDone != NULL)
 	{

src/test/regress/expected/portals.out

@@ -1269,6 +1269,76 @@ SELECT stringu1 FROM onek WHERE stringu1 = 'DZAAAA';
 ----------
 (0 rows)
 
+ROLLBACK;
+-- Check behavior with rewinding to a previous child scan node,
+-- as per bug #15395
+BEGIN;
+CREATE TABLE current_check (currentid int, payload text);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_1 () INHERITS (current_check);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_2 () INHERITS (current_check);
+INSERT INTO current_check_1 SELECT i, 'p' || i FROM generate_series(1,9) i;
+INSERT INTO current_check_2 SELECT i, 'P' || i FROM generate_series(10,19) i;
+DECLARE c1 SCROLL CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM current_check;
+-- This tests the fetch-backwards code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 12 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+        12 | P12
+(1 row)
+
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 8 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         8 | p8
+(1 row)
+
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         8 | p8
+(1 row)
+
+-- This tests the ExecutorRewind code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 13 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+        13 | P13
+(1 row)
+
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 1 FROM c1;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         1 | p1
+(1 row)
+
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         1 | p1
+(1 row)
+
+SELECT * FROM current_check;
+ currentid | payload 
+-----------+---------
+         2 | p2
+         3 | p3
+         4 | p4
+         5 | p5
+         6 | p6
+         7 | p7
+         9 | p9
+        10 | P10
+        11 | P11
+        12 | P12
+        13 | P13
+        14 | P14
+        15 | P15
+        16 | P16
+        17 | P17
+        18 | P18
+        19 | P19
+(17 rows)
+
 ROLLBACK;
 -- Make sure snapshot management works okay, per bug report in
 -- 235395b90909301035v7228ce63q392931f15aa74b31@mail.gmail.com

src/test/regress/sql/portals.sql

@@ -472,6 +472,30 @@ DELETE FROM onek WHERE CURRENT OF c1;
 SELECT stringu1 FROM onek WHERE stringu1 = 'DZAAAA';
 ROLLBACK;
 
+-- Check behavior with rewinding to a previous child scan node,
+-- as per bug #15395
+BEGIN;
+CREATE TABLE current_check (currentid int, payload text);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_1 () INHERITS (current_check);
+CREATE TABLE current_check_2 () INHERITS (current_check);
+INSERT INTO current_check_1 SELECT i, 'p' || i FROM generate_series(1,9) i;
+INSERT INTO current_check_2 SELECT i, 'P' || i FROM generate_series(10,19) i;
+
+DECLARE c1 SCROLL CURSOR FOR SELECT * FROM current_check;
+
+-- This tests the fetch-backwards code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 12 FROM c1;
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 8 FROM c1;
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+
+-- This tests the ExecutorRewind code path
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 13 FROM c1;
+FETCH ABSOLUTE 1 FROM c1;
+DELETE FROM current_check WHERE CURRENT OF c1 RETURNING *;
+
+SELECT * FROM current_check;
+ROLLBACK;
+
 -- Make sure snapshot management works okay, per bug report in
 -- 235395b90909301035v7228ce63q392931f15aa74b31@mail.gmail.com
 BEGIN;