database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-12-19 17:02:53 +03:00
Code Activity

Optimize shared memory usage for WaitLSNProcInfo

Browse Source 
We need separate pairing heaps for different WaitLSNType's, because there
might be waiters for different LSN's at the same time.  However, one process
can wait only for one type of LSN at a time.  So, no need for inHeap
and heapNode fields to be arrays.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPpHfdsBR-7sDtXFJ1qpJtKiohfGoj%3DvqzKVjWxtWsWidx7G_A%40mail.gmail.com
Author: Alexander Korotkov <aekorotkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Xuneng Zhou <xunengzhou@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Korotkov
2025-11-18 09:50:12 +02:00
parent 694b4ab33b
commit 75e82b2f5a
2 changed files with 29 additions and 27 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

42
src/backend/access/transam/xlogwait.c
View File

@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@ WaitLSNShmemInit(void)
for (i = 0; i < WAIT_LSN_TYPE_COUNT; i++)
{
pg_atomic_init_u64(&waitLSNState->minWaitedLSN[i], PG_UINT64_MAX);
pairingheap_initialize(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], waitlsn_cmp, (void *) (uintptr_t) i);
pairingheap_initialize(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], waitlsn_cmp, NULL);
}
/* Initialize process info array */
@@ -106,9 +106,8 @@ WaitLSNShmemInit(void)
static int
waitlsn_cmp(const pairingheap_node *a, const pairingheap_node *b, void *arg)
{
int i = (uintptr_t) arg;
const WaitLSNProcInfo *aproc = pairingheap_const_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode[i], a);
const WaitLSNProcInfo *bproc = pairingheap_const_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode[i], b);
const WaitLSNProcInfo *aproc = pairingheap_const_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode, a);
const WaitLSNProcInfo *bproc = pairingheap_const_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode, b);
if (aproc->waitLSN < bproc->waitLSN)
return 1;
@@ -132,7 +131,7 @@ updateMinWaitedLSN(WaitLSNType lsnType)
if (!pairingheap_is_empty(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i]))
{
pairingheap_node *node = pairingheap_first(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i]);
WaitLSNProcInfo *procInfo = pairingheap_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode[i], node);
WaitLSNProcInfo *procInfo = pairingheap_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode, node);
minWaitedLSN = procInfo->waitLSN;
}
@@ -154,10 +153,11 @@ addLSNWaiter(XLogRecPtr lsn, WaitLSNType lsnType)
procInfo->procno = MyProcNumber;
procInfo->waitLSN = lsn;
procInfo->lsnType = lsnType;
Assert(!procInfo->inHeap[i]);
pairingheap_add(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], &procInfo->heapNode[i]);
procInfo->inHeap[i] = true;
Assert(!procInfo->inHeap);
pairingheap_add(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], &procInfo->heapNode);
procInfo->inHeap = true;
updateMinWaitedLSN(lsnType);
LWLockRelease(WaitLSNLock);
@@ -176,10 +176,12 @@ deleteLSNWaiter(WaitLSNType lsnType)
LWLockAcquire(WaitLSNLock, LW_EXCLUSIVE);
if (procInfo->inHeap[i])
Assert(procInfo->lsnType == lsnType);
if (procInfo->inHeap)
{
pairingheap_remove(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], &procInfo->heapNode[i]);
procInfo->inHeap[i] = false;
pairingheap_remove(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i], &procInfo->heapNode);
procInfo->inHeap = false;
updateMinWaitedLSN(lsnType);
}
@@ -228,7 +230,7 @@ wakeupWaiters(WaitLSNType lsnType, XLogRecPtr currentLSN)
WaitLSNProcInfo *procInfo;
/* Get procInfo using appropriate heap node */
procInfo = pairingheap_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode[i], node);
procInfo = pairingheap_container(WaitLSNProcInfo, heapNode, node);
if (XLogRecPtrIsValid(currentLSN) && procInfo->waitLSN > currentLSN)
break;
@@ -238,7 +240,7 @@ wakeupWaiters(WaitLSNType lsnType, XLogRecPtr currentLSN)
(void) pairingheap_remove_first(&waitLSNState->waitersHeap[i]);
/* Update appropriate flag */
procInfo->inHeap[i] = false;
procInfo->inHeap = false;
if (numWakeUpProcs == WAKEUP_PROC_STATIC_ARRAY_SIZE)
break;
@@ -289,20 +291,14 @@ WaitLSNCleanup(void)
{
if (waitLSNState)
{
int i;
/*
* We do a fast-path check of the heap flags without the lock. These
* flags are set to true only by the process itself. So, it's only
* We do a fast-path check of the inHeap flag without the lock. This
* flag is set to true only by the process itself. So, it's only
* possible to get a false positive. But that will be eliminated by a
* recheck inside deleteLSNWaiter().
*/
for (i = 0; i < (int) WAIT_LSN_TYPE_COUNT; i++)
{
if (waitLSNState->procInfos[MyProcNumber].inHeap[i])
deleteLSNWaiter((WaitLSNType) i);
}
if (waitLSNState->procInfos[MyProcNumber].inHeap)
deleteLSNWaiter(waitLSNState->procInfos[MyProcNumber].lsnType);
}
}