Try another way to detect the result type of strerror_r().

The method we've traditionally used, of redeclaring strerror_r() to
see if the compiler complains of inconsistent declarations, turns out
not to work reliably because some compilers only report a warning,
not an error.  Amazingly, this has gone undetected for years, even
though it certainly breaks our detection of whether strerror_r
succeeded.

Let's instead test whether the compiler will take the result of
strerror_r() as a switch() argument.  It's possible this won't
work universally either, but it's the best idea I could come up with
on the spur of the moment.

We should probably back-patch this once the dust settles, but
first let's see what the buildfarm thinks of it.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/10877.1537993279@sss.pgh.pa.us

configure

@@ -10792,12 +10792,10 @@ else
 int
 main ()
 {
-#ifndef _AIX
-int strerror_r(int, char *, size_t);
-#else
-/* Older AIX has 'int' for the third argument so we don't test the args. */
-int strerror_r();
-#endif
+char buf[100];
+  switch (strerror_r(1, buf, sizeof(buf)))
+  { case 0: break; default: break; }
+
   ;
   return 0;
 }