mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-06-23 14:01:44 +03:00
Update FAQ_DEV.
This commit is contained in:
@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
|
||||
<H1>Developer's Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) for
|
||||
PostgreSQL</H1>
|
||||
|
||||
<P>Last updated: Tue Nov 5 16:49:16 EST 2002</P>
|
||||
<P>Last updated: Tue Nov 5 16:52:46 EST 2002</P>
|
||||
|
||||
<P>Current maintainer: Bruce Momjian (<A href=
|
||||
"mailto:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us">pgman@candle.pha.pa.us</A>)<BR>
|
||||
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@
|
||||
<P>First, we support 15+ operating systems, so any new feature has
|
||||
to be well established before we will consider it. Second, most new
|
||||
<I>wizz-bang</I> features don't provide <I>dramatic</I>
|
||||
improvements. Third, the usually have some downside, such as
|
||||
improvements. Third, they usually have some downside, such as
|
||||
decreased reliability or additional code required. Therefore, we
|
||||
don't rush to use new features but rather wait for the feature to be
|
||||
established, then ask for testing to show that a measurable
|
||||
@ -413,10 +413,10 @@
|
||||
<LI>The backend code would be more complex.</LI>
|
||||
</UL>
|
||||
|
||||
<P>So, we are not "asleep at the switch" as they say with regard to
|
||||
new features, it is just that we are cautious about their
|
||||
adoption. The TODO list often contains links to discussions
|
||||
showing our reasoning in these areas.</P>
|
||||
<P>So, we are not ignorant of new features. It is just that
|
||||
we are cautious about their adoption. The TODO list often
|
||||
contains links to discussions showing our reasoning in
|
||||
these areas.</P>
|
||||
|
||||
<H3><A name="1.10">1.10</A>) How are RPM's packaged?</H3>
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user