1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-03 20:02:46 +03:00

pgindent run for 9.0

This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2010-02-26 02:01:40 +00:00
parent 16040575a0
commit 65e806cba1
403 changed files with 6786 additions and 6530 deletions

View File

@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/constraint.c,v 1.3 2010/01/02 16:57:37 momjian Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/commands/constraint.c,v 1.4 2010/02/26 02:00:38 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -49,9 +49,9 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
bool isnull[INDEX_MAX_KEYS];
/*
* Make sure this is being called as an AFTER ROW trigger. Note:
* translatable error strings are shared with ri_triggers.c, so
* resist the temptation to fold the function name into them.
* Make sure this is being called as an AFTER ROW trigger. Note:
* translatable error strings are shared with ri_triggers.c, so resist the
* temptation to fold the function name into them.
*/
if (!CALLED_AS_TRIGGER(fcinfo))
ereport(ERROR,
@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
* If the new_row is now dead (ie, inserted and then deleted within our
* transaction), we can skip the check. However, we have to be careful,
* because this trigger gets queued only in response to index insertions;
* which means it does not get queued for HOT updates. The row we are
* which means it does not get queued for HOT updates. The row we are
* called for might now be dead, but have a live HOT child, in which case
* we still need to make the check. Therefore we have to use
* heap_hot_search, not just HeapTupleSatisfiesVisibility as is done in
@ -109,9 +109,9 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
}
/*
* Open the index, acquiring a RowExclusiveLock, just as if we were
* going to update it. (This protects against possible changes of the
* index schema, not against concurrent updates.)
* Open the index, acquiring a RowExclusiveLock, just as if we were going
* to update it. (This protects against possible changes of the index
* schema, not against concurrent updates.)
*/
indexRel = index_open(trigdata->tg_trigger->tgconstrindid,
RowExclusiveLock);
@ -125,9 +125,9 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
ExecStoreTuple(new_row, slot, InvalidBuffer, false);
/*
* Typically the index won't have expressions, but if it does we need
* an EState to evaluate them. We need it for exclusion constraints
* too, even if they are just on simple columns.
* Typically the index won't have expressions, but if it does we need an
* EState to evaluate them. We need it for exclusion constraints too,
* even if they are just on simple columns.
*/
if (indexInfo->ii_Expressions != NIL ||
indexInfo->ii_ExclusionOps != NULL)
@ -140,13 +140,13 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
estate = NULL;
/*
* Form the index values and isnull flags for the index entry that
* we need to check.
* Form the index values and isnull flags for the index entry that we need
* to check.
*
* Note: if the index uses functions that are not as immutable as they
* are supposed to be, this could produce an index tuple different from
* the original. The index AM can catch such errors by verifying that
* it finds a matching index entry with the tuple's TID. For exclusion
* Note: if the index uses functions that are not as immutable as they are
* supposed to be, this could produce an index tuple different from the
* original. The index AM can catch such errors by verifying that it
* finds a matching index entry with the tuple's TID. For exclusion
* constraints we check this in check_exclusion_constraint().
*/
FormIndexDatum(indexInfo, slot, estate, values, isnull);
@ -166,8 +166,8 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
else
{
/*
* For exclusion constraints we just do the normal check, but now
* it's okay to throw error.
* For exclusion constraints we just do the normal check, but now it's
* okay to throw error.
*/
check_exclusion_constraint(trigdata->tg_relation, indexRel, indexInfo,
&(new_row->t_self), values, isnull,
@ -175,8 +175,8 @@ unique_key_recheck(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
}
/*
* If that worked, then this index entry is unique or non-excluded,
* and we are done.
* If that worked, then this index entry is unique or non-excluded, and we
* are done.
*/
if (estate != NULL)
FreeExecutorState(estate);