From 65d857d92c418d732e3531a3761a32f2e352cb35 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 22:28:50 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix declaration after statement This style is frowned upon. I inadvertently introduced one in commit fe0e0b4fc7f0. (My compiler does not complain about it, even though -Wdeclaration-after-statement is specified. Weird.) Author: Masahiko Sawada --- src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c index b67ad5e8231..e0ac131a0e2 100644 --- a/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c +++ b/src/bin/pgbench/pgbench.c @@ -2725,9 +2725,11 @@ readCommandResponse(CState *st, char *varprefix) while (res != NULL) { - /* look now at the next result to know whether it is the last */ + bool is_last; + + /* peek at the next result to know whether the current is last */ next_res = PQgetResult(st->con); - bool is_last = (next_res == NULL); + is_last = (next_res == NULL); switch (PQresultStatus(res)) {