mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-14 08:21:07 +03:00
Pgindent run before 9.1 beta2.
This commit is contained in:
@ -2687,7 +2687,7 @@ cost_qual_eval_walker(Node *node, cost_qual_eval_context *context)
|
||||
* evaluation of AND/OR? Probably *not*, because that would make the
|
||||
* results depend on the clause ordering, and we are not in any position
|
||||
* to expect that the current ordering of the clauses is the one that's
|
||||
* going to end up being used. The above per-RestrictInfo caching would
|
||||
* going to end up being used. The above per-RestrictInfo caching would
|
||||
* not mix well with trying to re-order clauses anyway.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (IsA(node, FuncExpr))
|
||||
|
@ -953,7 +953,7 @@ is_dummy_rel(RelOptInfo *rel)
|
||||
* dummy.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Also, when called during GEQO join planning, we are in a short-lived
|
||||
* memory context. We must make sure that the dummy path attached to a
|
||||
* memory context. We must make sure that the dummy path attached to a
|
||||
* baserel survives the GEQO cycle, else the baserel is trashed for future
|
||||
* GEQO cycles. On the other hand, when we are marking a joinrel during GEQO,
|
||||
* we don't want the dummy path to clutter the main planning context. Upshot
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user