1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-09-02 04:21:28 +03:00

Reduce the maximum value of vacuum_cost_delay and autovacuum_vacuum_cost_delay

to 100ms (from 1000).  This still seems to be comfortably larger than the
useful range of the parameter, and it should help discourage people from
picking uselessly large values.  Tweak the documentation to recommend small
values, too.  Per discussion of a couple weeks ago.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2009-02-28 00:10:52 +00:00
parent 07b9936a0f
commit 640796ff41
6 changed files with 61 additions and 53 deletions

View File

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml,v 1.210 2009/02/24 12:09:08 petere Exp $ -->
<!-- $PostgreSQL: pgsql/doc/src/sgml/config.sgml,v 1.211 2009/02/28 00:10:50 tgl Exp $ -->
<chapter Id="runtime-config">
<title>Server Configuration</title>
@@ -1010,7 +1010,8 @@ SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
</para>
<para>
This feature is disabled by default. To enable it, set the
This feature is disabled by default for manually issued
<command>VACUUM</command> commands. To enable it, set the
<varname>vacuum_cost_delay</varname> variable to a nonzero
value.
</para>
@@ -1033,6 +1034,13 @@ SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN TO OFF;
not a multiple of 10 might have the same results as setting it
to the next higher multiple of 10.
</para>
<para>
When using cost-based vacuuming, appropriate values for
<varname>vacuum_cost_delay</> are usually quite small, perhaps
10 or 20 milliseconds. Adjusting vacuum's resource consumption
is best done by changing the other vacuum cost parameters.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>