1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-31 22:04:40 +03:00

Backpatch my fix of rev 1.48 to avoid a division-by-zero error in the

cost-limit vacuum code.  Per trouble report from Joshua Drake.
This commit is contained in:
Alvaro Herrera
2008-01-17 23:47:04 +00:00
parent 412eaece24
commit 5cbb5f31e1

View File

@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.29 2006/11/21 20:59:52 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/postmaster/autovacuum.c,v 1.29.2.1 2008/01/17 23:47:04 alvherre Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@ -736,6 +736,9 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
* If there is a tuple in pg_autovacuum, use it; else, use the GUC
* defaults. Note that the fields may contain "-1" (or indeed any
* negative value), which means use the GUC defaults for each setting.
*
* Note: in cost_limit, 0 also means use the value from elsewhere,
* because 0 is not a valid value for VacuumCostLimit.
*/
if (avForm != NULL)
{
@ -755,9 +758,9 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
Min(avForm->freeze_max_age, autovacuum_freeze_max_age) :
autovacuum_freeze_max_age;
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
vac_cost_limit = (avForm->vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
avForm->vac_cost_limit :
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
((autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit);
vac_cost_delay = (avForm->vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?
@ -776,7 +779,7 @@ test_rel_for_autovac(Oid relid, PgStat_StatTabEntry *tabentry,
freeze_min_age = default_freeze_min_age;
freeze_max_age = autovacuum_freeze_max_age;
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit >= 0) ?
vac_cost_limit = (autovacuum_vac_cost_limit > 0) ?
autovacuum_vac_cost_limit : VacuumCostLimit;
vac_cost_delay = (autovacuum_vac_cost_delay >= 0) ?