1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-02 09:02:37 +03:00

Add for_each_from, to simplify loops starting from non-first list cells.

We have a dozen or so places that need to iterate over all but the
first cell of a List.  Prior to v13 this was typically written as
	for_each_cell(lc, lnext(list_head(list)))
Commit 1cff1b95a changed these to
	for_each_cell(lc, list, list_second_cell(list))
This patch introduces a new macro for_each_from() which expresses
the start point as a list index, allowing these to be written as
	for_each_from(lc, list, 1)
This is marginally more efficient, since ForEachState.i can be
initialized directly instead of backing into it from a ListCell
address.  It also seems clearer and less typo-prone.

Some of the remaining uses of for_each_cell() look like they could
profitably be changed to for_each_from(), but here I confined myself
to changing uses of list_second_cell().

Also, fix for_each_cell_setup() and for_both_cell_setup() to
const-ify their arguments; that's a simple oversight in 1cff1b95a.

Back-patch into v13, on the grounds that (1) the const-ification
is a minor bug fix, and (2) it's better for back-patching purposes
if we only have two ways to write these loops rather than three.

In HEAD, also remove list_third_cell() and list_fourth_cell(),
which were also introduced in 1cff1b95a, and are unused as of
cc99baa43.  It seems unlikely that any third-party code would
have started to use them already; anyone who has can be directed
to list_nth_cell instead.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAApHDvpo1zj9KhEpU2cCRZfSM3Q6XGdhzuAS2v79PH7WJBkYVA@mail.gmail.com
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2020-09-28 20:32:53 -04:00
parent fe0a1dc52c
commit 56fe008996
9 changed files with 42 additions and 38 deletions

View File

@ -8113,7 +8113,7 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
{
BoolExpr *expr = (BoolExpr *) node;
Node *first_arg = linitial(expr->args);
ListCell *arg = list_second_cell(expr->args);
ListCell *arg;
switch (expr->boolop)
{
@ -8122,12 +8122,11 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_rule_expr_paren(first_arg, context,
false, node);
while (arg)
for_each_from(arg, expr->args, 1)
{
appendStringInfoString(buf, " AND ");
get_rule_expr_paren((Node *) lfirst(arg), context,
false, node);
arg = lnext(expr->args, arg);
}
if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context))
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');
@ -8138,12 +8137,11 @@ get_rule_expr(Node *node, deparse_context *context,
appendStringInfoChar(buf, '(');
get_rule_expr_paren(first_arg, context,
false, node);
while (arg)
for_each_from(arg, expr->args, 1)
{
appendStringInfoString(buf, " OR ");
get_rule_expr_paren((Node *) lfirst(arg), context,
false, node);
arg = lnext(expr->args, arg);
}
if (!PRETTY_PAREN(context))
appendStringInfoChar(buf, ')');