mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-07-28 23:42:10 +03:00
This patch implements holdable cursors, following the proposal
(materialization into a tuple store) discussed on pgsql-hackers earlier. I've updated the documentation and the regression tests. Notes on the implementation: - I needed to change the tuple store API slightly -- it assumes that it won't be used to hold data across transaction boundaries, so the temp files that it uses for on-disk storage are automatically reclaimed at end-of-transaction. I added a flag to tuplestore_begin_heap() to control this behavior. Is changing the tuple store API in this fashion OK? - in order to store executor results in a tuple store, I added a new CommandDest. This works well for the most part, with one exception: the current DestFunction API doesn't provide enough information to allow the Executor to store results into an arbitrary tuple store (where the particular tuple store to use is chosen by the call site of ExecutorRun). To workaround this, I've temporarily hacked up a solution that works, but is not ideal: since the receiveTuple DestFunction is passed the portal name, we can use that to lookup the Portal data structure for the cursor and then use that to get at the tuple store the Portal is using. This unnecessarily ties the Portal code with the tupleReceiver code, but it works... The proper fix for this is probably to change the DestFunction API -- Tom suggested passing the full QueryDesc to the receiveTuple function. In that case, callers of ExecutorRun could "subclass" QueryDesc to add any additional fields that their particular CommandDest needed to get access to. This approach would work, but I'd like to think about it for a little bit longer before deciding which route to go. In the mean time, the code works fine, so I don't think a fix is urgent. - (semi-related) I added a NO SCROLL keyword to DECLARE CURSOR, and adjusted the behavior of SCROLL in accordance with the discussion on -hackers. - (unrelated) Cleaned up some SGML markup in sql.sgml, copy.sgml Neil Conway
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
|
||||
<!--
|
||||
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml,v 1.29 2003/02/19 04:06:28 momjian Exp $
|
||||
$Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/doc/src/sgml/sql.sgml,v 1.30 2003/03/27 16:51:26 momjian Exp $
|
||||
-->
|
||||
|
||||
<chapter id="sql">
|
||||
@ -851,7 +851,7 @@ A < B + 3.
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The most often used command in <acronym>SQL</acronym> is the
|
||||
SELECT statement,
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> statement,
|
||||
used to retrieve data. The syntax is:
|
||||
|
||||
<synopsis>
|
||||
@ -881,7 +881,7 @@ SELECT [ ALL | DISTINCT [ ON ( <replaceable class="PARAMETER">expression</replac
|
||||
<title>Simple Selects</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Here are some simple examples using a SELECT statement:
|
||||
Here are some simple examples using a <command>SELECT</command> statement:
|
||||
|
||||
<example>
|
||||
<title id="simple-query">Simple Query with Qualification</title>
|
||||
@ -905,9 +905,10 @@ SELECT * FROM PART
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Using <quote>*</quote> in the SELECT statement will deliver all attributes from
|
||||
the table. If we want to retrieve only the attributes PNAME and PRICE
|
||||
from table PART we use the statement:
|
||||
Using <quote>*</quote> in the <command>SELECT</command> statement
|
||||
will deliver all attributes from the table. If we want to retrieve
|
||||
only the attributes PNAME and PRICE from table PART we use the
|
||||
statement:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
SELECT PNAME, PRICE
|
||||
@ -924,9 +925,9 @@ SELECT PNAME, PRICE
|
||||
Cam | 25
|
||||
</programlisting>
|
||||
|
||||
Note that the <acronym>SQL</acronym> SELECT corresponds to the
|
||||
<quote>projection</quote> in relational algebra not to the
|
||||
<quote>selection</quote> (see <xref linkend="rel-alg"
|
||||
Note that the <acronym>SQL</acronym> <command>SELECT</command>
|
||||
corresponds to the <quote>projection</quote> in relational algebra
|
||||
not to the <quote>selection</quote> (see <xref linkend="rel-alg"
|
||||
endterm="rel-alg"> for more details).
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1252,15 +1253,15 @@ select sname, pname from supplier
|
||||
<title id="aggregates-tutorial">Aggregate Operators</title>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
<acronym>SQL</acronym> provides aggregate operators
|
||||
(e.g. AVG, COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX) that
|
||||
take an expression as argument. The expression is evaluated at
|
||||
each row that satisfies the WHERE clause, and the aggregate operator
|
||||
is calculated over this set of input values. Normally, an aggregate
|
||||
delivers a single result for a whole SELECT statement. But if
|
||||
grouping is specified in the query, then a separate calculation is done
|
||||
over the rows of each group, and an aggregate result is delivered per
|
||||
group (see next section).
|
||||
<acronym>SQL</acronym> provides aggregate operators (e.g. AVG,
|
||||
COUNT, SUM, MIN, MAX) that take an expression as argument. The
|
||||
expression is evaluated at each row that satisfies the WHERE
|
||||
clause, and the aggregate operator is calculated over this set
|
||||
of input values. Normally, an aggregate delivers a single
|
||||
result for a whole <command>SELECT</command> statement. But if
|
||||
grouping is specified in the query, then a separate calculation
|
||||
is done over the rows of each group, and an aggregate result is
|
||||
delivered per group (see next section).
|
||||
|
||||
<example>
|
||||
<title id="aggregates-example">Aggregates</title>
|
||||
@ -1413,11 +1414,12 @@ SELECT S.SNO, S.SNAME, COUNT(SE.PNO)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Also observe that it makes no sense to ask for an aggregate of an
|
||||
aggregate, e.g., AVG(MAX(sno)), because a SELECT only does one pass
|
||||
of grouping and aggregation. You can get a result of this kind by
|
||||
using a temporary table or a sub-SELECT in the FROM clause to
|
||||
do the first level of aggregation.
|
||||
Also observe that it makes no sense to ask for an aggregate of
|
||||
an aggregate, e.g., AVG(MAX(sno)), because a
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> only does one pass of grouping and
|
||||
aggregation. You can get a result of this kind by using a
|
||||
temporary table or a sub-SELECT in the FROM clause to do the
|
||||
first level of aggregation.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</sect3>
|
||||
|
||||
@ -1502,16 +1504,18 @@ SELECT *
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
When we look at the above query we can see
|
||||
the keyword SELECT two times. The first one at the beginning of the
|
||||
query - we will refer to it as outer SELECT - and the one in the WHERE
|
||||
clause which begins a nested query - we will refer to it as inner
|
||||
SELECT. For every tuple of the outer SELECT the inner SELECT has to be
|
||||
evaluated. After every evaluation we know the price of the tuple named
|
||||
'Screw' and we can check if the price of the actual tuple is
|
||||
greater. (Actually, in this example the inner query need only be
|
||||
evaluated once, since it does not depend on the state of the outer
|
||||
query.)
|
||||
When we look at the above query we can see the keyword
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> two times. The first one at the
|
||||
beginning of the query - we will refer to it as outer
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> - and the one in the WHERE clause which
|
||||
begins a nested query - we will refer to it as inner
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command>. For every tuple of the outer
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> the inner <command>SELECT</command> has
|
||||
to be evaluated. After every evaluation we know the price of the
|
||||
tuple named 'Screw' and we can check if the price of the actual
|
||||
tuple is greater. (Actually, in this example the inner query need
|
||||
only be evaluated once, since it does not depend on the state of
|
||||
the outer query.)
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
@ -1528,11 +1532,13 @@ SELECT *
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
In our example the result will be empty because every supplier sells
|
||||
at least one part. Note that we use S.SNO from the outer SELECT within
|
||||
the WHERE clause of the inner SELECT. Here the subquery must be
|
||||
evaluated afresh for each tuple from the outer query, i.e. the value for
|
||||
S.SNO is always taken from the current tuple of the outer SELECT.
|
||||
In our example the result will be empty because every supplier
|
||||
sells at least one part. Note that we use S.SNO from the outer
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command> within the WHERE clause of the inner
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command>. Here the subquery must be evaluated
|
||||
afresh for each tuple from the outer query, i.e. the value for
|
||||
S.SNO is always taken from the current tuple of the outer
|
||||
<command>SELECT</command>.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</example>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
@ -1670,7 +1676,7 @@ EXCEPT
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The most fundamental command for data definition is the
|
||||
one that creates a new relation (a new table). The syntax of the
|
||||
CREATE TABLE command is:
|
||||
<command>CREATE TABLE</command> command is:
|
||||
|
||||
<synopsis>
|
||||
CREATE TABLE <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable>
|
||||
@ -1786,7 +1792,7 @@ CREATE TABLE SELLS
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
To create an index in <acronym>SQL</acronym>
|
||||
the CREATE INDEX command is used. The syntax is:
|
||||
the <command>CREATE INDEX</command> command is used. The syntax is:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
CREATE INDEX <replaceable class="parameter">index_name</replaceable>
|
||||
@ -1808,10 +1814,11 @@ CREATE INDEX I ON SUPPLIER (SNAME);
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The created index is maintained automatically, i.e. whenever a new tuple
|
||||
is inserted into the relation SUPPLIER the index I is adapted. Note
|
||||
that the only changes a user can perceive when an index is present
|
||||
are increased speed for SELECT and decreases in speed of updates.
|
||||
The created index is maintained automatically, i.e. whenever a new
|
||||
tuple is inserted into the relation SUPPLIER the index I is
|
||||
adapted. Note that the only changes a user can perceive when an
|
||||
index is present are increased speed for <command>SELECT</command>
|
||||
and decreases in speed of updates.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
</example>
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
@ -1916,7 +1923,7 @@ SELECT * FROM London_Suppliers
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
To destroy a table (including all tuples stored in that table) the
|
||||
DROP TABLE command is used:
|
||||
<command>DROP TABLE</command> command is used:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
DROP TABLE <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable>;
|
||||
@ -1932,7 +1939,7 @@ DROP TABLE SUPPLIER;
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
The DROP INDEX command is used to destroy an index:
|
||||
The <command>DROP INDEX</command> command is used to destroy an index:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
DROP INDEX <replaceable class="parameter">index_name</replaceable>;
|
||||
@ -1940,7 +1947,8 @@ DROP INDEX <replaceable class="parameter">index_name</replaceable>;
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
Finally to destroy a given view use the command DROP VIEW:
|
||||
Finally to destroy a given view use the command <command>DROP
|
||||
VIEW</command>:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
DROP VIEW <replaceable class="parameter">view_name</replaceable>;
|
||||
@ -1994,7 +2002,7 @@ INSERT INTO SELLS (SNO, PNO)
|
||||
|
||||
<para>
|
||||
To change one or more attribute values of tuples in a relation the
|
||||
UPDATE command is used. The syntax is:
|
||||
<command>UPDATE</command> command is used. The syntax is:
|
||||
|
||||
<programlisting>
|
||||
UPDATE <replaceable class="parameter">table_name</replaceable>
|
||||
@ -2126,7 +2134,7 @@ DELETE FROM SUPPLIER
|
||||
need a mechanism to access every single tuple of the set of tuples
|
||||
returned by a SELECT statement. This mechanism can be provided by
|
||||
declaring a <firstterm>cursor</firstterm>.
|
||||
After that we can use the FETCH command to
|
||||
After that we can use the <command>FETCH</command> command to
|
||||
retrieve a tuple and set the cursor to the next tuple.
|
||||
</para>
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user