mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-11-09 06:21:09 +03:00
Ye-old pgindent run. Same 4-space tabs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c,v 1.47 2000/03/21 05:12:06 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $Header: /cvsroot/pgsql/src/backend/optimizer/prep/prepunion.c,v 1.48 2000/04/12 17:15:23 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@
|
||||
#include "parser/parsetree.h"
|
||||
#include "utils/lsyscache.h"
|
||||
|
||||
typedef struct {
|
||||
typedef struct
|
||||
{
|
||||
Index rt_index;
|
||||
int sublevels_up;
|
||||
Oid old_relid;
|
||||
@@ -40,11 +41,11 @@ static RangeTblEntry *new_rangetable_entry(Oid new_relid,
|
||||
RangeTblEntry *old_entry);
|
||||
static void fix_parsetree_attnums(Index rt_index, Oid old_relid,
|
||||
Oid new_relid, Query *parsetree);
|
||||
static bool fix_parsetree_attnums_walker (Node *node,
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_context *context);
|
||||
static bool fix_parsetree_attnums_walker(Node *node,
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_context *context);
|
||||
static Append *make_append(List *appendplans, List *unionrtables,
|
||||
Index rt_index,
|
||||
List *inheritrtable, List *tlist);
|
||||
Index rt_index,
|
||||
List *inheritrtable, List *tlist);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
@@ -122,11 +123,11 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
/* Is this a simple one */
|
||||
if (!union_all_found ||
|
||||
!union_found ||
|
||||
/* A trailing UNION negates the effect of earlier UNION ALLs */
|
||||
/* A trailing UNION negates the effect of earlier UNION ALLs */
|
||||
!last_union_all_flag)
|
||||
{
|
||||
List *hold_unionClause = parse->unionClause;
|
||||
double tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default processing */
|
||||
double tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default processing */
|
||||
|
||||
/* we will do sorting later, so don't do it now */
|
||||
if (!union_all_found ||
|
||||
@@ -134,6 +135,7 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
parse->sortClause = NIL;
|
||||
parse->distinctClause = NIL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* force lower-level planning to assume that all tuples will
|
||||
* be retrieved, even if it sees a LIMIT in the query node.
|
||||
@@ -149,8 +151,9 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Query *union_query = lfirst(ulist);
|
||||
|
||||
/* use subquery_planner here because the union'd queries
|
||||
* have not been preprocessed yet. My goodness this is messy...
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* use subquery_planner here because the union'd queries have
|
||||
* not been preprocessed yet. My goodness this is messy...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans,
|
||||
subquery_planner(union_query,
|
||||
@@ -178,8 +181,8 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
* Recursion, but UNION only. The last one is a UNION, so it will
|
||||
* not come here in recursion.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX is it OK to pass default -1 to union_planner in this path,
|
||||
* or should we force a tuple_fraction value?
|
||||
* XXX is it OK to pass default -1 to union_planner in this path, or
|
||||
* should we force a tuple_fraction value?
|
||||
*/
|
||||
union_plans = lcons(union_planner(parse, -1.0), NIL);
|
||||
union_rts = lcons(parse->rtable, NIL);
|
||||
@@ -189,11 +192,12 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Query *union_all_query = lfirst(ulist);
|
||||
|
||||
/* use subquery_planner here because the union'd queries
|
||||
* have not been preprocessed yet. My goodness this is messy...
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* use subquery_planner here because the union'd queries have
|
||||
* not been preprocessed yet. My goodness this is messy...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
union_plans = lappend(union_plans,
|
||||
subquery_planner(union_all_query, -1.0));
|
||||
subquery_planner(union_all_query, -1.0));
|
||||
union_rts = lappend(union_rts, union_all_query->rtable);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -201,9 +205,11 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
/* We have already split UNION and UNION ALL and we made it consistent */
|
||||
if (!last_union_all_flag)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Need SELECT DISTINCT behavior to implement UNION.
|
||||
* Put back the held sortClause, add any missing columns to the
|
||||
* sort clause, and set distinctClause properly.
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Need SELECT DISTINCT behavior to implement UNION. Put back the
|
||||
* held sortClause, add any missing columns to the sort clause,
|
||||
* and set distinctClause properly.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
List *slitem;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -215,7 +221,7 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
SortClause *scl = (SortClause *) lfirst(slitem);
|
||||
TargetEntry *tle = get_sortgroupclause_tle(scl, parse->targetList);
|
||||
|
||||
if (! tle->resdom->resjunk)
|
||||
if (!tle->resdom->resjunk)
|
||||
parse->distinctClause = lappend(parse->distinctClause,
|
||||
copyObject(scl));
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -226,9 +232,10 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
parse->distinctClause = NIL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we don't try to apply the first query's grouping stuff
|
||||
* to the Append node, either. Basically we don't want union_planner
|
||||
* to do anything when we return control, except add the top sort/unique
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure we don't try to apply the first query's grouping stuff to
|
||||
* the Append node, either. Basically we don't want union_planner to
|
||||
* do anything when we return control, except add the top sort/unique
|
||||
* nodes for DISTINCT processing if this wasn't UNION ALL, or the top
|
||||
* sort node if it was UNION ALL with a user-provided sort clause.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -259,13 +266,13 @@ plan_union_queries(Query *parse)
|
||||
*
|
||||
* If grouping, aggregation, or sorting is specified in the parent plan,
|
||||
* the subplans should not do any of those steps --- we must do those
|
||||
* operations just once above the APPEND node. The given tlist has been
|
||||
* operations just once above the APPEND node. The given tlist has been
|
||||
* modified appropriately to remove group/aggregate expressions, but the
|
||||
* Query node still has the relevant fields set. We remove them in the
|
||||
* copies used for subplans (see plan_inherit_query).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* NOTE: this can be invoked recursively if more than one inheritance wildcard
|
||||
* is present. At each level of recursion, the first wildcard remaining in
|
||||
* is present. At each level of recursion, the first wildcard remaining in
|
||||
* the rangetable is expanded.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Append *
|
||||
@@ -282,8 +289,8 @@ plan_inherit_queries(Query *parse, List *tlist, Index rt_index)
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Remove the flag for this relation, since we're about to handle it.
|
||||
* XXX destructive change to parent parse tree, but necessary to prevent
|
||||
* infinite recursion.
|
||||
* XXX destructive change to parent parse tree, but necessary to
|
||||
* prevent infinite recursion.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rt_entry->inh = false;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -313,42 +320,44 @@ plan_inherit_query(Relids relids,
|
||||
List *union_plans = NIL;
|
||||
List *union_rtentries = NIL;
|
||||
List *save_tlist = root->targetList;
|
||||
double tuple_fraction;
|
||||
double tuple_fraction;
|
||||
List *i;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Avoid making copies of the root's tlist, which we aren't going to
|
||||
* use anyway (we are going to make copies of the passed tlist, instead).
|
||||
* use anyway (we are going to make copies of the passed tlist,
|
||||
* instead).
|
||||
*/
|
||||
root->targetList = NIL;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are going to need sorting or grouping at the top level,
|
||||
* force lower-level planners to assume that all tuples will be
|
||||
* retrieved.
|
||||
* If we are going to need sorting or grouping at the top level, force
|
||||
* lower-level planners to assume that all tuples will be retrieved.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (root->distinctClause || root->sortClause ||
|
||||
root->groupClause || root->hasAggs)
|
||||
tuple_fraction = 0.0; /* will need all tuples from each subplan */
|
||||
tuple_fraction = 0.0; /* will need all tuples from each subplan */
|
||||
else
|
||||
tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default behavior is OK (I think) */
|
||||
tuple_fraction = -1.0; /* default behavior is OK (I think) */
|
||||
|
||||
foreach(i, relids)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int relid = lfirsti(i);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make a modifiable copy of the original query,
|
||||
* and replace the target rangetable entry with a new one
|
||||
* identifying this child table.
|
||||
* Make a modifiable copy of the original query, and replace the
|
||||
* target rangetable entry with a new one identifying this child
|
||||
* table.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
Query *new_root = copyObject(root);
|
||||
RangeTblEntry *new_rt_entry = new_rangetable_entry(relid,
|
||||
rt_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_store(rt_index, new_root->rtable, new_rt_entry);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Insert (a modifiable copy of) the desired simplified tlist
|
||||
* into the subquery
|
||||
* Insert (a modifiable copy of) the desired simplified tlist into
|
||||
* the subquery
|
||||
*/
|
||||
new_root->targetList = copyObject(tlist);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -360,14 +369,15 @@ plan_inherit_query(Relids relids,
|
||||
new_root->sortClause = NIL;
|
||||
new_root->groupClause = NIL;
|
||||
new_root->havingQual = NULL;
|
||||
new_root->hasAggs = false; /* shouldn't be any left ... */
|
||||
new_root->hasAggs = false; /* shouldn't be any left ... */
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Update attribute numbers in case child has different ordering
|
||||
* of columns than parent (as can happen after ALTER TABLE).
|
||||
*
|
||||
* XXX This is a crock, and it doesn't really work. It'd be better
|
||||
* to fix ALTER TABLE to preserve consistency of attribute numbering.
|
||||
* to fix ALTER TABLE to preserve consistency of attribute
|
||||
* numbering.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums(rt_index,
|
||||
rt_entry->relid,
|
||||
@@ -397,23 +407,24 @@ find_all_inheritors(Oid parentrel)
|
||||
List *unexamined_relids = lconsi(parentrel, NIL);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* While the queue of unexamined relids is nonempty, remove the
|
||||
* first element, mark it examined, and find its direct descendants.
|
||||
* NB: cannot use foreach(), since we modify the queue inside loop.
|
||||
* While the queue of unexamined relids is nonempty, remove the first
|
||||
* element, mark it examined, and find its direct descendants. NB:
|
||||
* cannot use foreach(), since we modify the queue inside loop.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (unexamined_relids != NIL)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Oid currentrel = lfirsti(unexamined_relids);
|
||||
List *currentchildren;
|
||||
Oid currentrel = lfirsti(unexamined_relids);
|
||||
List *currentchildren;
|
||||
|
||||
unexamined_relids = lnext(unexamined_relids);
|
||||
examined_relids = lappendi(examined_relids, currentrel);
|
||||
currentchildren = find_inheritance_children(currentrel);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Add to the queue only those children not already seen.
|
||||
* This could probably be simplified to a plain nconc,
|
||||
* because our inheritance relationships should always be a
|
||||
* strict tree, no? Should never find any matches, ISTM...
|
||||
* Add to the queue only those children not already seen. This
|
||||
* could probably be simplified to a plain nconc, because our
|
||||
* inheritance relationships should always be a strict tree, no?
|
||||
* Should never find any matches, ISTM...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
currentchildren = set_differencei(currentchildren, examined_relids);
|
||||
unexamined_relids = LispUnioni(unexamined_relids, currentchildren);
|
||||
@@ -477,7 +488,7 @@ new_rangetable_entry(Oid new_relid, RangeTblEntry *old_entry)
|
||||
* 'old_relid' in 'parsetree' with the attribute numbers from
|
||||
* 'new_relid'.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The parsetree is MODIFIED IN PLACE. This is OK only because
|
||||
* The parsetree is MODIFIED IN PLACE. This is OK only because
|
||||
* plan_inherit_query made a copy of the tree for us to hack upon.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void
|
||||
@@ -495,6 +506,7 @@ fix_parsetree_attnums(Index rt_index,
|
||||
context.old_relid = old_relid;
|
||||
context.new_relid = new_relid;
|
||||
context.sublevels_up = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must scan both the targetlist and qual, but we know the
|
||||
* havingQual is empty, so we can ignore it.
|
||||
@@ -504,7 +516,7 @@ fix_parsetree_attnums(Index rt_index,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Adjust varnos for child tables. This routine makes it possible for
|
||||
* Adjust varnos for child tables. This routine makes it possible for
|
||||
* child tables to have different column positions for the "same" attribute
|
||||
* as a parent, which helps ALTER TABLE ADD COLUMN. Unfortunately this isn't
|
||||
* nearly enough to make it work transparently; there are other places where
|
||||
@@ -513,8 +525,8 @@ fix_parsetree_attnums(Index rt_index,
|
||||
* ALTER TABLE...
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static bool
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_walker (Node *node,
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_context *context)
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_walker(Node *node,
|
||||
fix_parsetree_attnums_context *context)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (node == NULL)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
@@ -534,9 +546,10 @@ fix_parsetree_attnums_walker (Node *node,
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (IsA(node, SubLink))
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Standard expression_tree_walker will not recurse into subselect,
|
||||
* but here we must do so.
|
||||
* Standard expression_tree_walker will not recurse into
|
||||
* subselect, but here we must do so.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
SubLink *sub = (SubLink *) node;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -588,9 +601,9 @@ make_append(List *appendplans,
|
||||
node->plan.plan_width = 0;
|
||||
foreach(subnode, appendplans)
|
||||
{
|
||||
Plan *subplan = (Plan *) lfirst(subnode);
|
||||
Plan *subplan = (Plan *) lfirst(subnode);
|
||||
|
||||
if (subnode == appendplans) /* first node? */
|
||||
if (subnode == appendplans) /* first node? */
|
||||
node->plan.startup_cost = subplan->startup_cost;
|
||||
node->plan.total_cost += subplan->total_cost;
|
||||
node->plan.plan_rows += subplan->plan_rows;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user