From 46371600aa2dac11ce6a8bcc314e5e037fb7ff9c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:17:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations. We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]" in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent, but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more widespread. Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with bleeding-edge compilers. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us --- src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c index 2508ed9b8f4..ae35fb8c559 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c +++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d) } int -rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3]) +rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy) { int mdy_int[3]; @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, char *fmt, char *str) } int -rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d) +rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d) { int mdy_int[3];