From 3ee23834ed48eaada0f4ae761ad7945b922a31ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alvaro Herrera Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2018 18:07:46 -0300 Subject: [PATCH] Relax overly strict sanity check for upgraded ancient databases Commit 4800f16a7ad0 added some sanity checks to ensure we don't accidentally corrupt data, but in one of them we failed to consider the effects of a database upgraded from 9.2 or earlier, where a tuple exclusively locked prior to the upgrade has a slightly different bit pattern. Fix that by using the macro that we fixed in commit 74ebba84aeb6 for similar situations. Reported-by: Alexandre Garcia Reviewed-by: Andres Freund Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAPYLKR6yxV4=pfW0Gwij7aPNiiPx+3ib4USVYnbuQdUtmkMaEA@mail.gmail.com Andres suspects that this bug may have wider ranging consequences, but I couldn't find anything. --- src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c index 1fbf52f1105..99165b1e487 100644 --- a/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c +++ b/src/backend/access/heap/heapam.c @@ -6071,7 +6071,7 @@ heap_prepare_freeze_tuple(HeapTupleHeader tuple, * independent of committedness, since a committed lock holder has * released the lock). */ - if (!(tuple->t_infomask & HEAP_XMAX_LOCK_ONLY) && + if (!HEAP_XMAX_IS_LOCKED_ONLY(tuple->t_infomask) && TransactionIdDidCommit(xid)) ereport(ERROR, (errcode(ERRCODE_DATA_CORRUPTED),