1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-06-30 21:42:05 +03:00

Support domains over composite types.

This is the last major omission in our domains feature: you can now
make a domain over anything that's not a pseudotype.

The major complication from an implementation standpoint is that places
that might be creating tuples of a domain type now need to be prepared
to apply domain_check().  It seems better that unprepared code fail
with an error like "<type> is not composite" than that it silently fail
to apply domain constraints.  Therefore, relevant infrastructure like
get_func_result_type() and lookup_rowtype_tupdesc() has been adjusted
to treat domain-over-composite as a distinct case that unprepared code
won't recognize, rather than just transparently treating it the same
as plain composite.  This isn't a 100% solution to the possibility of
overlooked domain checks, but it catches most places.

In passing, improve typcache.c's support for domains (it can now cache
the identity of a domain's base type), and rewrite the argument handling
logic in jsonfuncs.c's populate_record[set]_worker to reduce duplicative
per-call lookups.

I believe this is code-complete so far as the core and contrib code go.
The PLs need varying amounts of work, which will be tackled in followup
patches.

Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/4206.1499798337@sss.pgh.pa.us
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2017-10-26 13:47:45 -04:00
parent 08f1e1f0a4
commit 37a795a60b
37 changed files with 1085 additions and 293 deletions

View File

@ -1819,18 +1819,19 @@ ParseComplexProjection(ParseState *pstate, char *funcname, Node *first_arg,
}
/*
* Else do it the hard way with get_expr_result_type().
* Else do it the hard way with get_expr_result_tupdesc().
*
* If it's a Var of type RECORD, we have to work even harder: we have to
* find what the Var refers to, and pass that to get_expr_result_type.
* find what the Var refers to, and pass that to get_expr_result_tupdesc.
* That task is handled by expandRecordVariable().
*/
if (IsA(first_arg, Var) &&
((Var *) first_arg)->vartype == RECORDOID)
tupdesc = expandRecordVariable(pstate, (Var *) first_arg, 0);
else if (get_expr_result_type(first_arg, NULL, &tupdesc) != TYPEFUNC_COMPOSITE)
else
tupdesc = get_expr_result_tupdesc(first_arg, true);
if (!tupdesc)
return NULL; /* unresolvable RECORD type */
Assert(tupdesc);
for (i = 0; i < tupdesc->natts; i++)
{