1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-31 17:02:12 +03:00

Support triggers on views.

This patch adds the SQL-standard concept of an INSTEAD OF trigger, which
is fired instead of performing a physical insert/update/delete.  The
trigger function is passed the entire old and/or new rows of the view,
and must figure out what to do to the underlying tables to implement
the update.  So this feature can be used to implement updatable views
using trigger programming style rather than rule hacking.

In passing, this patch corrects the names of some columns in the
information_schema.triggers view.  It seems the SQL committee renamed
them somewhere between SQL:99 and SQL:2003.

Dean Rasheed, reviewed by Bernd Helmle; some additional hacking by me.
This commit is contained in:
Tom Lane
2010-10-10 13:43:33 -04:00
parent f7b15b5098
commit 2ec993a7cb
47 changed files with 2815 additions and 759 deletions

View File

@@ -33,7 +33,11 @@
<para>
A trigger is a specification that the database should automatically
execute a particular function whenever a certain type of operation is
performed. Triggers can be defined to execute either before or after any
performed. Triggers can be attached to both tables and views.
</para>
<para>
On tables, triggers can be defined to execute either before or after any
<command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>, or
<command>DELETE</command> operation, either once per modified row,
or once per <acronym>SQL</acronym> statement.
@@ -45,6 +49,20 @@
appropriate time to handle the event.
</para>
<para>
On views, triggers can be defined to execute instead of
<command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>, or
<command>DELETE</command> operations. <literal>INSTEAD OF</> triggers
are fired once for each row that needs to be modified in the view.
It is the responsibility of the
trigger's function to perform the necessary modifications to the
underlying base tables and, where appropriate, return the modified
row as it will appear in the view. Triggers on views can also be defined
to execute once per <acronym>SQL</acronym> statement, before or after
<command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>, or
<command>DELETE</command> operations.
</para>
<para>
The trigger function must be defined before the trigger itself can be
created. The trigger function must be declared as a
@@ -74,18 +92,29 @@
two types of triggers are sometimes called <firstterm>row-level</>
triggers and <firstterm>statement-level</> triggers,
respectively. Triggers on <command>TRUNCATE</command> may only be
defined at statement-level.
defined at statement level. On views, triggers that fire before or
after may only be defined at statement level, while triggers that fire
instead of an <command>INSERT</command>, <command>UPDATE</command>,
or <command>DELETE</command> may only be defined at row level.
</para>
<para>
Triggers are also classified as <firstterm>before</> triggers and
<firstterm>after</> triggers.
Statement-level before triggers naturally fire before the
statement starts to do anything, while statement-level after
triggers fire at the very end of the statement. Row-level before
Triggers are also classified according to whether they fire
<firstterm>before</>, <firstterm>after</>, or
<firstterm>instead of</> the operation. These are referred to
as <literal>BEFORE</> triggers, <literal>AFTER</> triggers, and
<literal>INSTEAD OF</> triggers respectively.
Statement-level <literal>BEFORE</> triggers naturally fire before the
statement starts to do anything, while statement-level <literal>AFTER</>
triggers fire at the very end of the statement. These types of
triggers may be defined on tables or views. Row-level <literal>BEFORE</>
triggers fire immediately before a particular row is operated on,
while row-level after triggers fire at the end of the statement
(but before any statement-level after triggers).
while row-level <literal>AFTER</> triggers fire at the end of the
statement (but before any statement-level <literal>AFTER</> triggers).
These types of triggers may only be defined on tables. Row-level
<literal>INSTEAD OF</> triggers may only be defined on views, and fire
immediately as each row in the view is identified as needing to be
operated on.
</para>
<para>
@@ -101,8 +130,8 @@
<para>
It can return <symbol>NULL</> to skip the operation for the
current row. This instructs the executor to not perform the
row-level operation that invoked the trigger (the insertion or
modification of a particular table row).
row-level operation that invoked the trigger (the insertion,
modification, or deletion of a particular table row).
</para>
</listitem>
@@ -117,14 +146,33 @@
</listitem>
</itemizedlist>
A row-level before trigger that does not intend to cause either of
these behaviors must be careful to return as its result the same
A row-level <literal>BEFORE</> trigger that does not intend to cause
either of these behaviors must be careful to return as its result the same
row that was passed in (that is, the <varname>NEW</varname> row
for <command>INSERT</command> and <command>UPDATE</command>
triggers, the <varname>OLD</varname> row for
<command>DELETE</command> triggers).
</para>
<para>
A row-level <literal>INSTEAD OF</> trigger should either return
<symbol>NULL</> to indicate that it did not modify any data from
the view's underlying base tables, or it should return the view
row that was passed in (the <varname>NEW</varname> row
for <command>INSERT</command> and <command>UPDATE</command>
operations, or the <varname>OLD</varname> row for
<command>DELETE</command> operations). A nonnull return value is
used to signal that the trigger performed the necessary data
modifications in the view. This will cause the count of the number
of rows affected by the command to be incremented. For
<command>INSERT</> and <command>UPDATE</> operations, the trigger
may modify the <varname>NEW</> row before returning it. This will
change the data returned by
<command>INSERT RETURNING</> or <command>UPDATE RETURNING</>,
and is useful when the view will not show exactly the same data
that was provided.
</para>
<para>
The return value is ignored for row-level triggers fired after an
operation, and so they can return <symbol>NULL</>.
@@ -133,11 +181,12 @@
<para>
If more than one trigger is defined for the same event on the same
relation, the triggers will be fired in alphabetical order by
trigger name. In the case of before triggers, the
possibly-modified row returned by each trigger becomes the input
to the next trigger. If any before trigger returns
trigger name. In the case of <literal>BEFORE</> and
<literal>INSTEAD OF</> triggers, the possibly-modified row returned by
each trigger becomes the input to the next trigger. If any
<literal>BEFORE</> or <literal>INSTEAD OF</> trigger returns
<symbol>NULL</>, the operation is abandoned for that row and subsequent
triggers are not fired.
triggers are not fired (for that row).
</para>
<para>
@@ -146,31 +195,37 @@
be fired. In row-level triggers the <literal>WHEN</> condition can
examine the old and/or new values of columns of the row. (Statement-level
triggers can also have <literal>WHEN</> conditions, although the feature
is not so useful for them.) In a before trigger, the <literal>WHEN</>
is not so useful for them.) In a <literal>BEFORE</> trigger, the
<literal>WHEN</>
condition is evaluated just before the function is or would be executed,
so using <literal>WHEN</> is not materially different from testing the
same condition at the beginning of the trigger function. However, in
an after trigger, the <literal>WHEN</> condition is evaluated just after
the row update occurs, and it determines whether an event is queued to
fire the trigger at the end of statement. So when an after trigger's
an <literal>AFTER</> trigger, the <literal>WHEN</> condition is evaluated
just after the row update occurs, and it determines whether an event is
queued to fire the trigger at the end of statement. So when an
<literal>AFTER</> trigger's
<literal>WHEN</> condition does not return true, it is not necessary
to queue an event nor to re-fetch the row at end of statement. This
can result in significant speedups in statements that modify many
rows, if the trigger only needs to be fired for a few of the rows.
<literal>INSTEAD OF</> triggers do not support
<literal>WHEN</> conditions.
</para>
<para>
Typically, row before triggers are used for checking or
Typically, row-level <literal>BEFORE</> triggers are used for checking or
modifying the data that will be inserted or updated. For example,
a before trigger might be used to insert the current time into a
a <literal>BEFORE</> trigger might be used to insert the current time into a
<type>timestamp</type> column, or to check that two elements of the row are
consistent. Row after triggers are most sensibly
consistent. Row-level <literal>AFTER</> triggers are most sensibly
used to propagate the updates to other tables, or make consistency
checks against other tables. The reason for this division of labor is
that an after trigger can be certain it is seeing the final value of the
row, while a before trigger cannot; there might be other before triggers
firing after it. If you have no specific reason to make a trigger before
or after, the before case is more efficient, since the information about
that an <literal>AFTER</> trigger can be certain it is seeing the final
value of the row, while a <literal>BEFORE</> trigger cannot; there might
be other <literal>BEFORE</> triggers firing after it. If you have no
specific reason to make a trigger <literal>BEFORE</> or
<literal>AFTER</>, the <literal>BEFORE</> case is more efficient, since
the information about
the operation doesn't have to be saved until end of statement.
</para>
@@ -237,7 +292,8 @@
Statement-level triggers follow simple visibility rules: none of
the changes made by a statement are visible to statement-level
triggers that are invoked before the statement, whereas all
modifications are visible to statement-level after triggers.
modifications are visible to statement-level <literal>AFTER</>
triggers.
</para>
</listitem>
@@ -245,14 +301,14 @@
<para>
The data change (insertion, update, or deletion) causing the
trigger to fire is naturally <emphasis>not</emphasis> visible
to SQL commands executed in a row-level before trigger, because
it hasn't happened yet.
to SQL commands executed in a row-level <literal>BEFORE</> trigger,
because it hasn't happened yet.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
However, SQL commands executed in a row-level before
However, SQL commands executed in a row-level <literal>BEFORE</>
trigger <emphasis>will</emphasis> see the effects of data
changes for rows previously processed in the same outer
command. This requires caution, since the ordering of these
@@ -263,7 +319,16 @@
<listitem>
<para>
When a row-level after trigger is fired, all data changes made
Similarly, a row-level <literal>INSTEAD OF</> trigger will see the
effects of data changes made by previous firings of <literal>INSTEAD
OF</> triggers in the same outer command.
</para>
</listitem>
<listitem>
<para>
When a row-level <literal>AFTER</> trigger is fired, all data
changes made
by the outer command are already complete, and are visible to
the invoked trigger function.
</para>
@@ -386,6 +451,15 @@ typedef struct TriggerData
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>TRIGGER_FIRED_INSTEAD(tg_event)</literal></term>
<listitem>
<para>
Returns true if the trigger fired instead of the operation.
</para>
</listitem>
</varlistentry>
<varlistentry>
<term><literal>TRIGGER_FIRED_FOR_ROW(tg_event)</literal></term>
<listitem>