From 2c2c7bc4592d561ccde1663dc7d28abc004e47dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Heikki Linnakangas Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 19:21:46 +0300 Subject: [PATCH] Fix off-by-one error in Assertion. The point of the assertion is to ensure that the arrays allocated in stack are large enough, but the check was one item short. This won't matter in practice because MaxIndexTuplesPerPage is an overestimate, so you can't have that many items on a page in reality. But let's be tidy. Spotted by Anastasia Lubennikova. Backpatch to all supported versions, like the patch that added the assertion. --- src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c b/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c index 4f32333f42d..71e7f5aaa23 100644 --- a/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c +++ b/src/backend/storage/page/bufpage.c @@ -723,7 +723,7 @@ PageIndexMultiDelete(Page page, OffsetNumber *itemnos, int nitems) int nextitm; OffsetNumber offnum; - Assert(nitems < MaxIndexTuplesPerPage); + Assert(nitems <= MaxIndexTuplesPerPage); /* * If there aren't very many items to delete, then retail