1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-09-03 15:22:11 +03:00
Alexander Korotkov
2023-04-03 16:54:31 +03:00
parent 8d928e3a9f
commit 2b65bf046d
6 changed files with 187 additions and 286 deletions

View File

@@ -45,12 +45,6 @@
#include "utils/builtins.h"
#include "utils/rel.h"
static TM_Result heapam_tuple_lock_internal(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid,
Snapshot snapshot, TupleTableSlot *slot,
CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool updated);
static void reform_and_rewrite_tuple(HeapTuple tuple,
Relation OldHeap, Relation NewHeap,
Datum *values, bool *isnull, RewriteState rwstate);
@@ -305,46 +299,14 @@ heapam_tuple_complete_speculative(Relation relation, TupleTableSlot *slot,
static TM_Result
heapam_tuple_delete(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, CommandId cid,
Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck, bool wait,
TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart,
LazyTupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool changingPart)
{
TM_Result result;
/*
* Currently Deleting of index tuples are handled at vacuum, in case if
* the storage itself is cleaning the dead tuples by itself, it is the
* time to call the index tuple deletion also.
*/
result = heap_delete(relation, tid, cid, crosscheck, wait,
tmfd, changingPart);
/*
* If the tuple has been concurrently updated, then get the lock on it.
* (Do this if caller asked for tat by providing a 'lockedSlot'.) With the
* lock held retry of delete should succeed even if there are more
* concurrent update attempts.
*/
if (result == TM_Updated && lockedSlot)
{
TupleTableSlot *evalSlot;
Assert(wait);
evalSlot = LAZY_TTS_EVAL(lockedSlot);
result = heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, tid, snapshot,
evalSlot, cid, LockTupleExclusive,
LockWaitBlock,
TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
tmfd, true);
if (result == TM_Ok)
{
tmfd->traversed = true;
return TM_Updated;
}
}
return result;
return heap_delete(relation, tid, cid, crosscheck, wait, tmfd, changingPart);
}
@@ -352,8 +314,7 @@ static TM_Result
heapam_tuple_update(Relation relation, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
CommandId cid, Snapshot snapshot, Snapshot crosscheck,
bool wait, TM_FailureData *tmfd,
LockTupleMode *lockmode, TU_UpdateIndexes *update_indexes,
LazyTupleTableSlot *lockedSlot)
LockTupleMode *lockmode, TU_UpdateIndexes *update_indexes)
{
bool shouldFree = true;
HeapTuple tuple = ExecFetchSlotHeapTuple(slot, true, &shouldFree);
@@ -391,32 +352,6 @@ heapam_tuple_update(Relation relation, ItemPointer otid, TupleTableSlot *slot,
if (shouldFree)
pfree(tuple);
/*
* If the tuple has been concurrently updated, then get the lock on it.
* (Do this if caller asked for tat by providing a 'lockedSlot'.) With the
* lock held retry of update should succeed even if there are more
* concurrent update attempts.
*/
if (result == TM_Updated && lockedSlot)
{
TupleTableSlot *evalSlot;
Assert(wait);
evalSlot = LAZY_TTS_EVAL(lockedSlot);
result = heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, otid, snapshot,
evalSlot, cid, *lockmode,
LockWaitBlock,
TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION,
tmfd, true);
if (result == TM_Ok)
{
tmfd->traversed = true;
return TM_Updated;
}
}
return result;
}
@@ -425,26 +360,10 @@ heapam_tuple_lock(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot,
TupleTableSlot *slot, CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
TM_FailureData *tmfd)
{
return heapam_tuple_lock_internal(relation, tid, snapshot, slot, cid,
mode, wait_policy, flags, tmfd, false);
}
/*
* This routine does the work for heapam_tuple_lock(), but also support
* `updated` argument to re-use the work done by heapam_tuple_update() or
* heapam_tuple_delete() on figuring out that tuple was concurrently updated.
*/
static TM_Result
heapam_tuple_lock_internal(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid,
Snapshot snapshot, TupleTableSlot *slot,
CommandId cid, LockTupleMode mode,
LockWaitPolicy wait_policy, uint8 flags,
TM_FailureData *tmfd, bool updated)
{
BufferHeapTupleTableSlot *bslot = (BufferHeapTupleTableSlot *) slot;
TM_Result result;
Buffer buffer = InvalidBuffer;
Buffer buffer;
HeapTuple tuple = &bslot->base.tupdata;
bool follow_updates;
@@ -455,26 +374,16 @@ heapam_tuple_lock_internal(Relation relation, ItemPointer tid,
tuple_lock_retry:
tuple->t_self = *tid;
if (!updated)
result = heap_lock_tuple(relation, tuple, cid, mode, wait_policy,
follow_updates, &buffer, tmfd);
else
result = TM_Updated;
result = heap_lock_tuple(relation, tuple, cid, mode, wait_policy,
follow_updates, &buffer, tmfd);
if (result == TM_Updated &&
(flags & TUPLE_LOCK_FLAG_FIND_LAST_VERSION))
{
if (!updated)
{
/* Should not encounter speculative tuple on recheck */
Assert(!HeapTupleHeaderIsSpeculative(tuple->t_data));
/* Should not encounter speculative tuple on recheck */
Assert(!HeapTupleHeaderIsSpeculative(tuple->t_data));
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
}
else
{
updated = false;
}
ReleaseBuffer(buffer);
if (!ItemPointerEquals(&tmfd->ctid, &tuple->t_self))
{

View File

@@ -306,8 +306,7 @@ simple_table_tuple_delete(Relation rel, ItemPointer tid, Snapshot snapshot)
GetCurrentCommandId(true),
snapshot, InvalidSnapshot,
true /* wait for commit */ ,
&tmfd, false /* changingPart */ ,
NULL);
&tmfd, false /* changingPart */ );
switch (result)
{
@@ -356,8 +355,7 @@ simple_table_tuple_update(Relation rel, ItemPointer otid,
GetCurrentCommandId(true),
snapshot, InvalidSnapshot,
true /* wait for commit */ ,
&tmfd, &lockmode, update_indexes,
NULL);
&tmfd, &lockmode, update_indexes);
switch (result)
{