Revert "Fix bogus %name-prefix option syntax in all our Bison files."

This reverts commit ece7aa8b0f.

It turns out that the %name-prefix syntax without "=" does not work
at all in pre-2.4 Bison.  We are not prepared to make such a large
jump in minimum required Bison version just to suppress a warning
message in a version hardly any developers are using yet.
When 3.0 gets more popular, we'll figure out a way to deal with this.
In the meantime, BISONFLAGS=-Wno-deprecated is recommendable for
anyone using 3.0 who doesn't want to see the warning.

src/backend/bootstrap/bootparse.y

@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ static int num_columns_read = 0;
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "boot_yy"
+%name-prefix="boot_yy"
 
 %union
 {

src/backend/parser/gram.y

@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@ static Node *makeRecursiveViewSelect(char *relname, List *aliases, Node *query);
 
 %pure-parser
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "base_yy"
+%name-prefix="base_yy"
 %locations
 
 %parse-param {core_yyscan_t yyscanner}

src/backend/replication/repl_gram.y

@@ -51,7 +51,7 @@ Node *replication_parse_result;
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "replication_yy"
+%name-prefix="replication_yy"
 
 %union {
 		char					*str;

src/interfaces/ecpg/preproc/ecpg.header

@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@ add_typedef(char *name, char *dimension, char *length, enum ECPGttype type_enum,
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "base_yy"
+%name-prefix="base_yy"
 %locations
 
 %union {

src/pl/plpgsql/src/pl_gram.y

@@ -110,7 +110,7 @@ static	List			*read_raise_options(void);
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "plpgsql_yy"
+%name-prefix="plpgsql_yy"
 %locations
 
 %union {

src/test/isolation/specparse.y

@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ TestSpec		parseresult;			/* result of parsing is left here */
 %}
 
 %expect 0
-%name-prefix "spec_yy"
+%name-prefix="spec_yy"
 
 %union
 {