From 25f9a7266282cdac858c1bbc77fac2497349ef8b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Lane Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2021 11:17:13 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] Make ecpg's rjulmdy() and rmdyjul() agree with their declarations. We had "short *mdy" in the extern declarations, but "short mdy[3]" in the actual function definitions. Per C99 these are equivalent, but recent versions of gcc have started to issue warnings about the inconsistency. Clean it up before the warnings get any more widespread. Back-patch, in case anyone wants to build older PG versions with bleeding-edge compilers. Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/2401575.1611764534@sss.pgh.pa.us --- src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c index 13058cf7bf7..49832c50c53 100644 --- a/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c +++ b/src/interfaces/ecpg/compatlib/informix.c @@ -533,7 +533,7 @@ rtoday(date * d) } int -rjulmdy(date d, short mdy[3]) +rjulmdy(date d, short *mdy) { int mdy_int[3]; @@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ rfmtdate(date d, const char *fmt, char *str) } int -rmdyjul(short mdy[3], date * d) +rmdyjul(short *mdy, date * d) { int mdy_int[3];