database/postgres
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-08-18 12:22:09 +03:00
Code Activity

pgindent run for 9.0, second run

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
Bruce Momjian
2010-07-06 19:19:02 +00:00
parent 52783b212c
commit 239d769e7e
127 changed files with 1503 additions and 1417 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

19
src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c
View File

@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
*
*
* IDENTIFICATION
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c,v 1.102 2010/05/28 01:14:03 tgl Exp $
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/executor/nodeMergejoin.c,v 1.103 2010/07/06 19:18:56 momjian Exp $
*
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
*/
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ MJExamineQuals(List *mergeclauses,
* input, since we assume mergejoin operators are strict. If the NULL
* is in the first join column, and that column sorts nulls last, then
* we can further conclude that no following tuple can match anything
* either, since they must all have nulls in the first column. However,
* either, since they must all have nulls in the first column. However,
* that case is only interesting if we're not in FillOuter mode, else
* we have to visit all the tuples anyway.
*
@@ -748,6 +748,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
switch (MJEvalInnerValues(node, innerTupleSlot))
{
case MJEVAL_MATCHABLE:
/*
* OK, we have the initial tuples. Begin by skipping
* non-matching tuples.
@@ -922,6 +923,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
switch (MJEvalInnerValues(node, innerTupleSlot))
{
case MJEVAL_MATCHABLE:
/*
* Test the new inner tuple to see if it matches
* outer.
@@ -944,6 +946,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
}
break;
case MJEVAL_NONMATCHABLE:
/*
* It contains a NULL and hence can't match any outer
* tuple, so we can skip the comparison and assume the
@@ -952,10 +955,11 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
node->mj_JoinState = EXEC_MJ_NEXTOUTER;
break;
case MJEVAL_ENDOFJOIN:
/*
* No more inner tuples. However, this might be
* only effective and not physical end of inner plan,
* so force mj_InnerTupleSlot to null to make sure we
* No more inner tuples. However, this might be only
* effective and not physical end of inner plan, so
* force mj_InnerTupleSlot to null to make sure we
* don't fetch more inner tuples. (We need this hack
* because we are not transiting to a state where the
* inner plan is assumed to be exhausted.)
@@ -1152,9 +1156,11 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
node->mj_JoinState = EXEC_MJ_SKIP_TEST;
break;
case MJEVAL_NONMATCHABLE:
/*
* current inner can't possibly match any outer;
* better to advance the inner scan than the outer.
* better to advance the inner scan than the
* outer.
*/
node->mj_JoinState = EXEC_MJ_SKIPINNER_ADVANCE;
break;
@@ -1337,6 +1343,7 @@ ExecMergeJoin(MergeJoinState *node)
node->mj_JoinState = EXEC_MJ_SKIP_TEST;
break;
case MJEVAL_NONMATCHABLE:
/*
* current inner can't possibly match any outer;
* better to advance the inner scan than the outer.