1
0
mirror of https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git synced 2025-07-28 23:42:10 +03:00

RLS refactoring

This refactors rewrite/rowsecurity.c to simplify the handling of the
default deny case (reducing the number of places where we check for and
add the default deny policy from three to one) by splitting up the
retrival of the policies from the application of them.

This also allowed us to do away with the policy_id field.  A policy_name
field was added for WithCheckOption policies and is used in error
reporting, when available.

Patch by Dean Rasheed, with various mostly cosmetic changes by me.

Back-patch to 9.5 where RLS was introduced to avoid unnecessary
differences, since we're still in alpha, per discussion with Robert.
This commit is contained in:
Stephen Frost
2015-09-15 15:49:31 -04:00
parent 000a21336b
commit 22eaf35c1d
13 changed files with 452 additions and 462 deletions

View File

@ -83,7 +83,7 @@ SELECT * FROM rls_test_restrictive;
INSERT INTO rls_test_restrictive VALUES ('r1','s1',10);
-- failure
INSERT INTO rls_test_restrictive VALUES ('r4','s4',10);
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy for "rls_test_restrictive"
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy "extension policy" for "rls_test_restrictive"
SET ROLE s1;
-- With only the hook's policies, both
-- permissive hook's policy is current_user = username
@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ EXPLAIN (costs off) SELECT * FROM rls_test_permissive;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on rls_test_permissive
Filter: (("current_user"() = username) OR ((data % 2) = 0))
Filter: (((data % 2) = 0) OR ("current_user"() = username))
(2 rows)
SELECT * FROM rls_test_permissive;
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ SELECT * FROM rls_test_restrictive;
INSERT INTO rls_test_restrictive VALUES ('r1','s1',8);
-- failure
INSERT INTO rls_test_restrictive VALUES ('r3','s3',10);
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy for "rls_test_restrictive"
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy "extension policy" for "rls_test_restrictive"
-- failure
INSERT INTO rls_test_restrictive VALUES ('r1','s1',7);
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy for "rls_test_restrictive"
@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ EXPLAIN (costs off) SELECT * FROM rls_test_both;
QUERY PLAN
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Subquery Scan on rls_test_both
Filter: (("current_user"() = rls_test_both.username) OR ((rls_test_both.data % 2) = 0))
Filter: (((rls_test_both.data % 2) = 0) OR ("current_user"() = rls_test_both.username))
-> Seq Scan on rls_test_both rls_test_both_1
Filter: ("current_user"() = supervisor)
(4 rows)
@ -190,7 +190,7 @@ SELECT * FROM rls_test_both;
INSERT INTO rls_test_both VALUES ('r1','s1',8);
-- failure
INSERT INTO rls_test_both VALUES ('r3','s3',10);
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy for "rls_test_both"
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy "extension policy" for "rls_test_both"
-- failure
INSERT INTO rls_test_both VALUES ('r1','s1',7);
ERROR: new row violates row level security policy for "rls_test_both"

View File

@ -87,7 +87,6 @@ test_rls_hooks_permissive(CmdType cmdtype, Relation relation)
role = ObjectIdGetDatum(ACL_ID_PUBLIC);
policy->policy_name = pstrdup("extension policy");
policy->policy_id = InvalidOid;
policy->polcmd = '*';
policy->roles = construct_array(&role, 1, OIDOID, sizeof(Oid), true, 'i');
@ -151,7 +150,6 @@ test_rls_hooks_restrictive(CmdType cmdtype, Relation relation)
role = ObjectIdGetDatum(ACL_ID_PUBLIC);
policy->policy_name = pstrdup("extension policy");
policy->policy_id = InvalidOid;
policy->polcmd = '*';
policy->roles = construct_array(&role, 1, OIDOID, sizeof(Oid), true, 'i');