mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-11-06 07:49:08 +03:00
Avoid recursion when processing simple lists of AND'ed or OR'ed clauses.
Since most of the system thinks AND and OR are N-argument expressions anyway, let's have the grammar generate a representation of that form when dealing with input like "x AND y AND z AND ...", rather than generating a deeply-nested binary tree that just has to be flattened later by the planner. This avoids stack overflow in parse analysis when dealing with queries having more than a few thousand such clauses; and in any case it removes some rather unsightly inconsistencies, since some parts of parse analysis were generating N-argument ANDs/ORs already. It's still possible to get a stack overflow with weirdly parenthesized input, such as "x AND (y AND (z AND ( ... )))", but such cases are not mainstream usage. The maximum depth of parenthesization is already limited by Bison's stack in such cases, anyway, so that the limit is probably fairly platform-independent. Patch originally by Gurjeet Singh, heavily revised by me
This commit is contained in:
@@ -133,9 +133,9 @@ static Node *find_jointree_node_for_rel(Node *jtnode, int relid);
|
||||
* transformations if any are found.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This routine has to run before preprocess_expression(), so the quals
|
||||
* clauses are not yet reduced to implicit-AND format. That means we need
|
||||
* to recursively search through explicit AND clauses, which are
|
||||
* probably only binary ANDs. We stop as soon as we hit a non-AND item.
|
||||
* clauses are not yet reduced to implicit-AND format, and are not guaranteed
|
||||
* to be AND/OR-flat either. That means we need to recursively search through
|
||||
* explicit AND clauses. We stop as soon as we hit a non-AND item.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
void
|
||||
pull_up_sublinks(PlannerInfo *root)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,13 +4,12 @@
|
||||
* Routines for preprocessing qualification expressions
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The parser regards AND and OR as purely binary operators, so a qual like
|
||||
* (A = 1) OR (A = 2) OR (A = 3) ...
|
||||
* will produce a nested parsetree
|
||||
* (OR (A = 1) (OR (A = 2) (OR (A = 3) ...)))
|
||||
* In reality, the optimizer and executor regard AND and OR as N-argument
|
||||
* operators, so this tree can be flattened to
|
||||
* (OR (A = 1) (A = 2) (A = 3) ...)
|
||||
* While the parser will produce flattened (N-argument) AND/OR trees from
|
||||
* simple sequences of AND'ed or OR'ed clauses, there might be an AND clause
|
||||
* directly underneath another AND, or OR underneath OR, if the input was
|
||||
* oddly parenthesized. Also, rule expansion and subquery flattening could
|
||||
* produce such parsetrees. The planner wants to flatten all such cases
|
||||
* to ensure consistent optimization behavior.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Formerly, this module was responsible for doing the initial flattening,
|
||||
* but now we leave it to eval_const_expressions to do that since it has to
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user