From 1f7b8967ef192fad75f72dd5eb12b188647b3670 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Frost Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 13:51:14 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typo in add_paths_to_append_rel() The comment should have been referring to the number of workers, not the number of paths. Author: Ashutosh Bapat Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAFjFpRcbp4702jcp387PExt3fNCt62QJN8++DQGwBhsW6wRHWA@mail.gmail.com --- src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c index ea4e683abb0..8735e29807d 100644 --- a/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c +++ b/src/backend/optimizer/path/allpaths.c @@ -1574,7 +1574,7 @@ add_paths_to_append_rel(PlannerInfo *root, RelOptInfo *rel, /* * If the use of parallel append is permitted, always request at least - * log2(# of children) paths. We assume it can be useful to have + * log2(# of children) workers. We assume it can be useful to have * extra workers in this case because they will be spread out across * the children. The precise formula is just a guess, but we don't * want to end up with a radically different answer for a table with N