mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-09-05 02:22:28 +03:00
Standard pgindent run for 8.1.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
|
||||
*
|
||||
*
|
||||
* IDENTIFICATION
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/nodes/list.c,v 1.65 2005/07/28 20:26:19 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/backend/nodes/list.c,v 1.66 2005/10/15 02:49:18 momjian Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -50,7 +50,6 @@ check_list_invariants(List *list)
|
||||
Assert(list->head->next == list->tail);
|
||||
Assert(list->tail->next == NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
#define check_list_invariants(l)
|
||||
#endif /* USE_ASSERT_CHECKING */
|
||||
@@ -532,9 +531,9 @@ list_delete_cell(List *list, ListCell *cell, ListCell *prev)
|
||||
Assert(prev != NULL ? lnext(prev) == cell : list_head(list) == cell);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we're about to delete the last node from the list, free the
|
||||
* whole list instead and return NIL, which is the only valid
|
||||
* representation of a zero-length list.
|
||||
* If we're about to delete the last node from the list, free the whole
|
||||
* list instead and return NIL, which is the only valid representation of
|
||||
* a zero-length list.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (list->length == 1)
|
||||
{
|
||||
@@ -543,9 +542,8 @@ list_delete_cell(List *list, ListCell *cell, ListCell *prev)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Otherwise, adjust the necessary list links, deallocate the
|
||||
* particular node we have just removed, and return the list we were
|
||||
* given.
|
||||
* Otherwise, adjust the necessary list links, deallocate the particular
|
||||
* node we have just removed, and return the list we were given.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list->length--;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -951,7 +949,7 @@ list_append_unique_oid(List *list, Oid datum)
|
||||
* via equal().
|
||||
*
|
||||
* This is almost the same functionality as list_union(), but list1 is
|
||||
* modified in-place rather than being copied. Note also that list2's cells
|
||||
* modified in-place rather than being copied. Note also that list2's cells
|
||||
* are not inserted in list1, so the analogy to list_concat() isn't perfect.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
List *
|
||||
@@ -1110,8 +1108,8 @@ list_copy(List *oldlist)
|
||||
newlist->length = oldlist->length;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copy over the data in the first cell; new_list() has already
|
||||
* allocated the head cell itself
|
||||
* Copy over the data in the first cell; new_list() has already allocated
|
||||
* the head cell itself
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newlist->head->data = oldlist->head->data;
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1163,8 +1161,8 @@ list_copy_tail(List *oldlist, int nskip)
|
||||
oldlist_cur = oldlist_cur->next;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Copy over the data in the first remaining cell; new_list() has
|
||||
* already allocated the head cell itself
|
||||
* Copy over the data in the first remaining cell; new_list() has already
|
||||
* allocated the head cell itself
|
||||
*/
|
||||
newlist->head->data = oldlist_cur->data;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user