From 170679216d225d979daf2651f2bf73bc08ffdd26 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bruce Momjian Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2020 17:36:54 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] C comment: correct commented bytes of max_cached_tuplebufs The comment said ~8MB, but it is actually ~64MB. Reported-by: Kuntal Ghosh Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/CAGz5QC+GGmHdnxp04B6wcLz2Zcd_HU+wCBrsPyOZP62-BJghig@mail.gmail.com Backpatch-through: 9.5-10 --- src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c b/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c index 94266505afb..165ba8fde10 100644 --- a/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c +++ b/src/backend/replication/logical/reorderbuffer.c @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ static const Size max_changes_in_memory = 4096; * major bottleneck, especially when spilling to disk while decoding batch * workloads. */ -static const Size max_cached_tuplebufs = 4096 * 2; /* ~8MB */ +static const Size max_cached_tuplebufs = 4096 * 2; /* ~64MB */ /* --------------------------------------- * primary reorderbuffer support routines