mirror of
https://github.com/postgres/postgres.git
synced 2025-11-06 07:49:08 +03:00
Rethink original decision to use AND/OR Expr nodes to represent bitmap
logic operations during planning. Seems cleaner to create two new Path node types, instead --- this avoids duplication of cost-estimation code. Also, create an enable_bitmapscan GUC parameter to control use of bitmap plans.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
|
||||
* Portions Copyright (c) 1996-2005, PostgreSQL Global Development Group
|
||||
* Portions Copyright (c) 1994, Regents of the University of California
|
||||
*
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/include/nodes/nodes.h,v 1.167 2005/04/19 22:35:17 tgl Exp $
|
||||
* $PostgreSQL: pgsql/src/include/nodes/nodes.h,v 1.168 2005/04/21 19:18:13 tgl Exp $
|
||||
*
|
||||
*-------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@@ -170,6 +170,8 @@ typedef enum NodeTag
|
||||
T_Path,
|
||||
T_IndexPath,
|
||||
T_BitmapHeapPath,
|
||||
T_BitmapAndPath,
|
||||
T_BitmapOrPath,
|
||||
T_NestPath,
|
||||
T_MergePath,
|
||||
T_HashPath,
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user